2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extragalactic gamma-ray background from star-forming galaxies: Will empirical scalings suffice?

Abstract: Despite the influx of unprecedented-quality data from the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope that have been collected over nine years of operation, the contribution of normal star-forming galaxies to the extragalactic gamma-ray background (EGRB) remains poorly constrained. Different estimates are discrepant both their underlying physical assumptions and their results. With several detections and many upper limits for the gamma-ray fluxes of nearby star-forming galaxies now available, estimates that rely on empiri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gamma-ray flux from a galaxy has been modeled in a number of studies to predict the cosmic gamma-ray background from star forming galaxies (Strong et al 1976;Lichti et al 1978;Dar & Shaviv 1995;Pavlidou & Fields 2002;Thompson et al 2007;Ando & Pavlidou 2009;Fields et al 2010;Makiya et al 2011;Stecker & Venters 2011;Ackermann et al 2012a;Chakraborty & Fields 2013;Lacki et al 2014;Komis et al 2017;Lamastra et al 2017), and most studies estimated gammaray luminosity only from one or two physical quantities (e.g. SFR, gas mass, or infrared luminosity) assuming empirical relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamma-ray flux from a galaxy has been modeled in a number of studies to predict the cosmic gamma-ray background from star forming galaxies (Strong et al 1976;Lichti et al 1978;Dar & Shaviv 1995;Pavlidou & Fields 2002;Thompson et al 2007;Ando & Pavlidou 2009;Fields et al 2010;Makiya et al 2011;Stecker & Venters 2011;Ackermann et al 2012a;Chakraborty & Fields 2013;Lacki et al 2014;Komis et al 2017;Lamastra et al 2017), and most studies estimated gammaray luminosity only from one or two physical quantities (e.g. SFR, gas mass, or infrared luminosity) assuming empirical relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,39]), though it is consistent with the conclusion of Refs. [5] and [40] that, in the absence of either a physical model for the γ-ray emission of SFGs or a much larger sample of resolved galaxies, it is not possible to rule them out as a dominant contributor. It is nonetheless instructive to examine the precise reasons why our conclusions differ from some earlier work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models indicate that multiple source classes meaningfully contribute ( > ∼ 10%) to the total γ-ray luminosity of our universe. Moreover, the extragalactic γ-ray luminosity (EGRB) is relatively equally divided into emission between a handful of extremely bright point sources [1][2][3][4][5], and an underlying sea of dim sources, known collectively as the isotropic γ-ray background (IGRB) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. While the latter coincidence depends on the sensitivity of the instrument (in this case the Fermi-LAT), population models and statistical studies [6,[14][15][16][17][18] indicate that the distinction is also physically meaningful, with significant and distinct contributions from very bright and very dim sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%