1965
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800520211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrahepatic portal-venous obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
3

Year Published

1969
1969
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
32
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Only sporadic reports appeared over the next few decades [7][8][9] illustrating the rarity of this condition in the West. Though surgical hazards posed by common bile duct (CBD) varices were recognized in the late 1970s, 10 it was the seminal paper by Webb and Sherlock 11 that focussed attention on this condition.…”
Section: Historical Perspective Nomenclature and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Only sporadic reports appeared over the next few decades [7][8][9] illustrating the rarity of this condition in the West. Though surgical hazards posed by common bile duct (CBD) varices were recognized in the late 1970s, 10 it was the seminal paper by Webb and Sherlock 11 that focussed attention on this condition.…”
Section: Historical Perspective Nomenclature and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators believe that umbilical vein catheterization and umbilical sepsis are responsible for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) others disagree. [8][9][10][11][12] The discrepancies between the observations are probably because of the studies that have been retrospective and clinical. In an Indian prospective ultrasonographic study up to 24 months, none of the 11 patients with septicaemia or umbilical sepsis developed portal vein thrombosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of 13 major retrospective studies (1, 6, 9, 12-14, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 29), a positive history of neonatal infection was available in a percentage varying from 3.5 to 56.2%, in most of them, the origin being the umbilicus. In only six of these studies (9,13,19,23,26,29) was a positive history of cannulation of umbilical vein available, with a percentage varying from 4.2 to 38.4%. Some characteristics of these studies have limited their generalizability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%