1997
DOI: 10.1080/00224499709551881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
220
4
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(38 reference statements)
20
220
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research based on large samples has revealed somewhat lower numbers of women engaging in extradyadic sex. Laumann et al (1994), for instance, found 15% of women to have engaged in extramarital sex, whereas Wiederman (1997) found 12% of women between ages 18 and 59 to have had extradyadic sex. A possible explanation is that our sample included a substantial number of cohabiting and dating women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research based on large samples has revealed somewhat lower numbers of women engaging in extradyadic sex. Laumann et al (1994), for instance, found 15% of women to have engaged in extramarital sex, whereas Wiederman (1997) found 12% of women between ages 18 and 59 to have had extradyadic sex. A possible explanation is that our sample included a substantial number of cohabiting and dating women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men also report more casual sex partners (Baldwin & Baldwin, 1988;Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994;Townsend, 1995;Traeen & Lewin, 1992) and are more receptive to sexual offers than women (Clark, 1990;Clark & Hatfield, 1989;Greitemeyer, 2005). However, several researchers have noted that it is statistically impossible to have a gender gap between male and female numbers of heterosexual STM-partners (Baumeister, Catanese, & Vohs, 2001;Brown & Sinclair, 1999;Pedersen, Miller, Putcha-Bhagavatula, & Yang, 2002;Wiederman, 1997). Several recent studies support this notion, showing that the gender gap in number of STM-partners is not as universal and robust as previously stated (e.g., Cubbins & Tanfer, 2000;Johnson et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…suggested that many of these infidelities could be the result of strategic short-term mate poaches. Among more developed societies, the occurrence rate of infidelity-defined as the percentage of people who have ever been unfaithful-is also appreciable and ranges from 20% to 75% depending on age, type of relationship, and relationship duration (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983;Thompson, 1983;Wiederman, 1997). Infidelity prevalence rates-such as the percentage of people who have been unfaithful in the past year-must by definition be somewhat lower than occurrence rates but are still considerable, ranging between 10% and 25% (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983;Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%