2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1297-319x(03)00140-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraskeletal risk factors for fractures of the proximal femur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This number is expected to increase to 2.6 million in 2025 and 4.5 million in 2050, mainly as a consequence of population aging [1]. Hip fractures mainly affect the elderly, especially women [2, 3]. In general, hip fractures have significant consequences on individuals and health-care systems [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This number is expected to increase to 2.6 million in 2025 and 4.5 million in 2050, mainly as a consequence of population aging [1]. Hip fractures mainly affect the elderly, especially women [2, 3]. In general, hip fractures have significant consequences on individuals and health-care systems [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hip fractures mainly affect the elderly, especially women [2, 3]. In general, hip fractures have significant consequences on individuals and health-care systems [2]. They are an important source of morbidity and mortality: 20–30 % of hip fracture patients die within 1 year after the fracture, and one-third are totally dependent or reside in a nursing home after 1 year [4, 5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: +41 residence and cognitive impairment were significant factors that increase the risk factors for hip fractures. Lefauveau [19] presented a review where the role of height, body mass, the reason for falls, age, gender, ethnicity and geographic area of birth as well as physical activity were investigated in connection with fractures of the proximal femur. A further classification of risk factors was given by Woolf et al [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faulkner and others [38][39][40] reported that the hip axis length (HAL) is a risk factor independent of the BMD and Lochmüller et al [41] confirmed this hypothesis by finding a positive correlation between HAL and femoral strength. Lefauveau et al [19] reported that the femoral neck length was greater in a group of patients who suffered a fracture and that a longer femoral neck increased the odds ratio for true neck fractures, but not for trochanteric fractures. Center et al [42] found a greater femoral neck width (FNW) in fracture cases than in controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%