2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrasolar Binary Planets. Ii. Detectability by Transit Observations

Abstract: We discuss the detectability of gravitationally bounded pairs of gas-giant planets (which we call "binary planets") in extrasolar planetary systems that are formed through orbital instability followed by planet-planet dynamical tides during their close encounters, based on the results of N-body simulations by Ochiai, Nagasawa and Ida (Paper I). Paper I showed that the formation probability of a binary is as much as ∼ 10% for three giant planet systems that undergo orbital instability, and after post-capture lo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Solar system, centaurs, Main Belt asteroids, Jupiter trojans, and trans-Neptunian objects have all been observed to contain moons. Also, although not yet observed, double planets may form through close encounters (Ochiai, Nagasawa & Ida 2014;Lewis et al 2015). Further, moons of moons of planets may be formed through a similar mechanism.…”
Section: Additional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the Solar system, centaurs, Main Belt asteroids, Jupiter trojans, and trans-Neptunian objects have all been observed to contain moons. Also, although not yet observed, double planets may form through close encounters (Ochiai, Nagasawa & Ida 2014;Lewis et al 2015). Further, moons of moons of planets may be formed through a similar mechanism.…”
Section: Additional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Usually studies of resolved stellar populations assume a universal IMF (e.g. that of Kroupa 2001, also known as the Kroupa IMF) and solve for the SFH (relatively recent examples include Gogarten et al 2009;Weisz et al 2011Weisz et al , 2013Annibali et al 2013;Lianou & Cole 2013;Meschin et al 2014;Lewis et al 2015). Instead, we adopt a plausible recent SFH of constant rate star formation and solve for the IMF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One particularly interesting candidate object is CoRoT SRc01 E2 1066, which shows a peculiar bump near the center of the transit light curve that might be induced by the mutual eclipse of a transiting binary planet system (Lewis et al 2015), i.e., a giant planet with a very large and massive satellite. However, only one single transit of this object (or these two objects) has been observed, and so it is currently impossible to discriminate between a binary planet and a star-spot crossing interpretation of the data.…”
Section: Interpreting the J1407b Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a particularly interesting method, since the mutual eclipses of two transiting planets have already been observed (de Wit et al 2016). Yet, in the latter case, the two planets were known to exist prior to the observation of their common transit, whereas for a detection of an exomoon through mutual eclipses it would be necessary to test the data against a possible origin from star-spot crossings of the planet (Lewis et al 2015) and to use an independent method for validation.…”
Section: Direct Transit Signatures Of Exomoonsmentioning
confidence: 99%