2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrasyllabicity, transparency and prosodic constituency in the acquisition of Polish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies and analyses of child language acquisition also point to the relative instability of /ʂ/. Some studies of Polish have suggested either that /ʂ/ is only acquired after / ɕ/ (Łukaszewicz 2006) and/or that the contrast between dental and retroflex places of articulation emerges quite late (Łobacz 1996). Moreover, Nittrouer & Studdert-Kennedy (1987) and Nittrouer (1992, 2002) provide evidence that children rely much more than adults on dynamic than static information for phonetic categorization: for example, young children make far greater use of vowel transitions than the noise for fricative categorization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies and analyses of child language acquisition also point to the relative instability of /ʂ/. Some studies of Polish have suggested either that /ʂ/ is only acquired after / ɕ/ (Łukaszewicz 2006) and/or that the contrast between dental and retroflex places of articulation emerges quite late (Łobacz 1996). Moreover, Nittrouer & Studdert-Kennedy (1987) and Nittrouer (1992, 2002) provide evidence that children rely much more than adults on dynamic than static information for phonetic categorization: for example, young children make far greater use of vowel transitions than the noise for fricative categorization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the acquisition of Polish sibilants have shown that children acquire /ʂ/ relatively late and typically after the other sibilants have been acquired (Łukaszewicz 2006, 2007). The articulatory instability in /ʂ/ and the findings from language acquisition might also be related to the diachronic change of the three-way / ʂ ɕ/ to a two-way distinction as a result of an / ʂ/ merger in both the Min variety of Mandarin (Duanmu 2006, Chuang & Fon 2010) and in several Polish dialects (Żygis, Pape & Czaplicki 2012b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies of syllable-structure development in Polish (ńukaszewicz 2006, Zydorowicz 2007, Jarosz 2010, Jarosz et al to appear). Jarosz (2010) examines the development of basic CV syllable structure, in particular the relative timing of the development of initial and final clusters, but does not examine the role of sonority sequencing.…”
Section: Sonority-sequencing Effects In Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jarosz (2010) examines the development of basic CV syllable structure, in particular the relative timing of the development of initial and final clusters, but does not examine the role of sonority sequencing. ńukaszewicz (2006) does examine sonority-sequencing effects, but her focus is on extrasyllabic sonorants (sonorants that cannot be syllabified consistently with the SSP) and on processes that depend on it, like voicing. Consistent with the present arguments, she demonstrates that the SSP plays a role in children's development of these particularly marked configurations.…”
Section: Sonority-sequencing Effects In Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…docierać – dotrze in (5a.i) and brać – bierze in (5b)); likewise, the /ɛ/ ~ zero alternation is seen in szewek – szwy in (5a.ii). In such cases, pre-school children have been reported to have difficulty in perceiving the regularity of the connection between different forms of the same morpheme (Łukaszewicz 2006b: 16–17). Unlike Voice Assimilation, which can be internalised via pure phonotactic learning, Progressive Devoicing requires access to the morphological structure of words.…”
Section: The Interacting Processes: Basic Generalisations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%