2021
DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraterritorial application of the GDPR: promoting European values or power?

Abstract: This article examines whether the territorial scope of the EU General Data Protection Regulation promotes European values. While the regulation received international attention, it remains questionable whether provisions with extraterritorial effect support a power-based approach or a value-driven strategy. Developments around the enforceability of a 'right to be forgotten' , or the difficulties in regulating transatlantic data flows, raise doubts as to whether unilateral standard setting does justice to the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis thus contributes to research studying how policymakers react to the increasing importance of data-based value creation and its regulation (Aaronson, 2019a;Burri, 2021a;Ferracane, 2021;Goyal et al, 2021;Kalyanpur & Newman, 2019). It also speaks to other contributions showing how despite prominent references to values and individual rights in the EU's digital agenda, these are often overshadowed by economic concerns (Gstrein & Zwitter, 2021;Jančiūtė, 2017;Niklas & Dencik, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The analysis thus contributes to research studying how policymakers react to the increasing importance of data-based value creation and its regulation (Aaronson, 2019a;Burri, 2021a;Ferracane, 2021;Goyal et al, 2021;Kalyanpur & Newman, 2019). It also speaks to other contributions showing how despite prominent references to values and individual rights in the EU's digital agenda, these are often overshadowed by economic concerns (Gstrein & Zwitter, 2021;Jančiūtė, 2017;Niklas & Dencik, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the context of data protection regulations, the Brussels effect occurs through economic sanctions, since countries that refuse to comply with minimum European data protection requirements are sanctioned from doing business in the EU (Kuner, 2020). Therefore, the EU expands its data protection standards beyond its borders (Gstrein & Zwitter, 2021)…”
Section: Replicating the Gdpr Into The Lgpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to recognise that “Although data privacy is no longer new to Africa, compliance with data privacy norms has been significantly lower compared to other jurisdictions” (Abdulrauf, 2021, p. 87). Whilst international privacy legislation such as the GDPR has become a global standard of a particular understanding and protection of individual privacy, there are also views that the global acceptance of the GDPR as normative can be seen as imperialistic with a disregard for contextual understandings of privacy (Gstrein & Zwitter, 2021; Mannion, 2020), in particular from the Global South (Makulilo, 2016a, 2016b). Considering the lasting legacy of colonialism in the Global South, and in particular on the African continent, it should not come as a surprise that there are scholars and institutions in the Global South that are pushing back against the EU as ‘normative power’ (Berge, 2021) to the exclusion of local and regional understandings of, for example, privacy.…”
Section: Data Privacy and Legislation On The African Continent In A B...mentioning
confidence: 99%