The Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003090014-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraterritorial obligations in the European human rights system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it seems that the crucial issue in dispute here is whether or not the Norwegian state has a positive obligation under the ECHR to mitigate the effects of climate change both at home and abroad, by moving away from fossil fuels, that is, a duty of care to achieve a transition to renewable sources. In its unprecedented judgment, the Norwegian Supreme Court stated that the fundamental right to a healthy environment is only applicable in Norway (Gociu & Roy, 2021), under very limited circumstances (Voigt, 2021), largely overlooking the Strasbourg jurisprudence on extraterritorial human rights obligations for example (Haeck et al, 2022). The case law on extraterritorial human rights obligations under the ECHR is contentious, however, lacking a clear methodology to solve complex cases:…”
Section: Greenpeace Nordic and Others Against Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it seems that the crucial issue in dispute here is whether or not the Norwegian state has a positive obligation under the ECHR to mitigate the effects of climate change both at home and abroad, by moving away from fossil fuels, that is, a duty of care to achieve a transition to renewable sources. In its unprecedented judgment, the Norwegian Supreme Court stated that the fundamental right to a healthy environment is only applicable in Norway (Gociu & Roy, 2021), under very limited circumstances (Voigt, 2021), largely overlooking the Strasbourg jurisprudence on extraterritorial human rights obligations for example (Haeck et al, 2022). The case law on extraterritorial human rights obligations under the ECHR is contentious, however, lacking a clear methodology to solve complex cases:…”
Section: Greenpeace Nordic and Others Against Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%