2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5018402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremal flows in Wasserstein space

Abstract: We develop an intrinsic geometric approach to the calculus of variations in the Wasserstein space. We show that the flows associated with the Schrödinger bridge with general prior, with optimal mass transport, and with the Madelung fluid can all be characterized as annihilating the first variation of a suitable action. We then discuss the implications of this unified framework for stochastic mechanics: It entails, in particular, a sort of fluid-dynamic reconciliation between Bohm’s and Nelson’s stochastic mech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example 4 (Schrödinger Bridge problem). Consider a Schrödinger system [3] ∂ t η t = 1 2 ∆η t , ∂ t η * t = − 1 2 ∆η * t .…”
Section: It Is Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Example 4 (Schrödinger Bridge problem). Consider a Schrödinger system [3] ∂ t η t = 1 2 ∆η t , ∂ t η * t = − 1 2 ∆η * t .…”
Section: It Is Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, the study of Hamiltonian flows in density manifold follows Nelson's stochastic mechanics [1,7,8,9,10]. See related work in [3]. Along with this framework, Lafferty introduces the Riemannian manifold structure of density space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is naturally equipped with the inner product of L 2 \mu . Several recent papers have contributed to the development of second-order calculus in Wasserstein's space [245,69,70,71], building on [164,113,6].…”
Section: The Dynamic Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of completeness of our discussion, we also reveal the relations among the so-called Schrödinger system [9,11,3] and our derived systems ( 13) and ( 16). All three PDE systems are derived from the SBP.…”
Section: Discrete Sbp Based On Relative Entropy and Reference Markov ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.1. In approach (A), the Hamiltonian systems ( (13), ( 16) and ( 21)) are corresponding to the control problem (11), which is derived from discretizing the relative entropy H(P |Q) in (27); In approach (B), the Hamiltonian systems ( (24) and ( 25)) are corresponding to the control problem (23), which is derived via discretizing the Fisher information I(ρ) in (28). It worth mentioning that under continuous cases, ( 27) and (28) are equivalent under the transform (29) and their corresponding Hamiltonian systems are also equivalent.…”
Section: Discrete Sbp Based On Minimum Action With Fisher Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%