2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11253-006-0118-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremal problems of nonoverlapping domains with free poles on a circle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, n, the domains Γ ∞ are mutually disjoint for all k = 1, n, p = 1, m, and q = 1, 2, and the corresponding points γ (q) k,p , 1, and −1 form a system of 2m + 2 points on the unit circle. In view of Theorem 2 in [6], this yields…”
Section: C(ε D a Nm )| := (Cap C(ε D A Nm )) −1mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, n, the domains Γ ∞ are mutually disjoint for all k = 1, n, p = 1, m, and q = 1, 2, and the corresponding points γ (q) k,p , 1, and −1 form a system of 2m + 2 points on the unit circle. In view of Theorem 2 in [6], this yields…”
Section: C(ε D a Nm )| := (Cap C(ε D A Nm )) −1mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This problem aroused interest of many mathematicians. At present, the results and methods related to problems of this type form a well-known branch of the geometric theory of functions of a complex variable (see, e.g., [2][3][4][5][6][7]). For the first time, the fundamental role of quadratic differentials as a universal tool for the solution of extremal problems of the geometric theory of functions was noted by Teichmuller [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting these inequalities into (4) and using the fact that σ α The statement concerning the equality sign in Theorem 2 is verified by analogy with [5] (the proof of Theorem 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Let with respect to the point a (all definitions used in the present paper can be found, e.g., in [5]; note only that, in contrast to [6], we understand the interior radius with respect to an infinitely remote point in the sense of the definition proposed in [2]). For a Borel set E ⊂ C , we denote by cap E its logarithmic capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection of numbers { } ρ k k n =1 is uniquely determined by the system of points A n,2 (see also [13]). Let ) are nonempty and pairwise disjoint for all k = 1, n, then we say that the set D satisfies the generalized condition of nonoverlapping with respect to the system of points A n,2 (respectively, with respect to the system of points A n = { } a k k n =1 )) (see, e.g., [14,15]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%