1992
DOI: 10.4153/cjm-1992-032-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme and Exposed Points in Orlicz Spaces

Abstract: Extreme points of the unit sphere in any Orlicz space over a measure space that contains no atoms of infinite measure are characterized. In the case of a finite-valued Orlicz function and a nonatomic measure space, exposed points of the unit sphere in these spaces are characterized too. Some corollaries and examples are also given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although methods developed in papers [10,11,13] are useful in our considerations, in many cases to solve the problems from this paper, developing of some new techniques was necessary.…”
Section: Introduction and Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although methods developed in papers [10,11,13] are useful in our considerations, in many cases to solve the problems from this paper, developing of some new techniques was necessary.…”
Section: Introduction and Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…every but one) t £ T (cf. [5,16]). Thus the only extreme point of B(L9(p)) with x > 0, I (x) < 1 can be the function e defined by e(t) = c(cp) for t £ T. Let us fix an arbitrary element co0 of the set W. We have e £ extB(L<p(p)) iff \\e\\ > 1 (indeed, if ||e|| < 1 then c(cp) < co and <p(c(<p)) < oo; so (c(tp), <p(c(cp))) are points of strict convexity of Graph cp , and by virtue of [5,16], e £ tx\B(L9(p))).…”
Section: Auxiliary Definitions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…t G T. Next by the finiteness of /i we have Iq>(\x) < 00 for any A > 0. This is a contradiction, because in the case when I®(x) = 0 the quality ||JC||<D = 1 implies that I®(\x) -00 for any À > 1 (see [2]).…”
Section: ((I+lyn)>2-n ®(U N )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROOF. It is known that every strongly extreme point is extreme and that under the assumptions concerning O, if x G 5(L°) is extreme then it must be I®(x) -1 (see [2]). Therefore, it suffices to consider only these points of 5(L°) for which I®(x) = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%