2018
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2017.2761258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme Atmospheric Radiation Environments and Single Event Effects

Abstract: Abstract-Data from ground-level radiation monitors and cosmogenic nuclides are combined to a give a probability distribution for severe radiation events related to the well quantified event of 23 February 1956. Particle fluxes, single event effects rates and dose rates are calculated for groundlevel and aerospace systems. The event of February 1956 would provide a challenge to air safety while more extreme events seen in historical records would challenge safety-critical ground systems. A new space weather haz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early attempts to consider the influence of GLEs, such as C. S. Dyer et al. (2003), have recently been greatly improved (C. Dyer et al., 2017), by updated modeling of the largest event directly measured on February 23, 1956 and by generation of the size distribution, using recent events directly observed since 1942, together with evidence for historic events from cosmogenic nuclides, which were first noted by Miyake et al. (2012).…”
Section: Space Weather and Atmospheric Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early attempts to consider the influence of GLEs, such as C. S. Dyer et al. (2003), have recently been greatly improved (C. Dyer et al., 2017), by updated modeling of the largest event directly measured on February 23, 1956 and by generation of the size distribution, using recent events directly observed since 1942, together with evidence for historic events from cosmogenic nuclides, which were first noted by Miyake et al. (2012).…”
Section: Space Weather and Atmospheric Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the current space weather community expects this kind of event to happen once a century with a potential catastrophe for the modern society (Baker et al, ; Daglis, ; Dyer et al, ; Hapgood, ; Riley, ; Riley et al, ; Riley & Love, ; Schrijver et al, ), the historical evidence indicates that we need to be slightly more careful about the meaning of “extreme space weather events.” We were quite fortunate that the extreme ICME in July 2012 missed the Earth. Some estimates of its potential Dst value appear to be even more extreme than that of the Carrington event (Baker et al, ; Liu et al, , ; Ngwira et al, ).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Spatial Evolution Of The Auroral Ovals Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEEs are a serious problem for electronics operated in space (e.g., Edmonds, Barnes, and Scheick, 2000—a JPL publication; O'Bryan et al, ; Xapsos et al, ), and they are becoming an issue for advanced technologies in avionics (e. g., Dyer & Truscott, ; Dyer et al, ), and even at sea level. The charge deposited by a single ionizing particle (producing a dense track of electron‐hole pairs in devices, circuits, and components) can produce a wide range of effects, including single‐event upset (transient and nondestructive, affecting mainly memories), multiple bit upset (nondestructive), single‐event transient (nondestructive), single‐event functional interrupt (nondestructive), single‐event latch‐up (destructive, affecting mainly complementary metal‐oxide‐semiconductor structure), single‐event burnout (destructive; affecting mainly power metal‐oxide‐semiconductor field‐effect transistors), single‐event gate rupture (potentially destructive, affecting mainly submicronic structure), and single hard error (another destructive effect).…”
Section: Space Radiation and Plasma Effects On Space Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%