Innovations in Fuel Economy and Sustainable Road Transport 2011
DOI: 10.1533/9780857095879.4.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme engine downsizing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The point is then given a time weighting based on the total driving-cycle time. 107 The calculated fuel economy using the engine steady-state look-up tables has been proved to be within 3% error of running the full vehicle but with approximately 40 times less computational time. 66 2.…”
Section: Modelling Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The point is then given a time weighting based on the total driving-cycle time. 107 The calculated fuel economy using the engine steady-state look-up tables has been proved to be within 3% error of running the full vehicle but with approximately 40 times less computational time. 66 2.…”
Section: Modelling Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Downsizing strategies have been adopted to produce smaller and lighter engines capable of achieving the performance of much larger ones. To do so, turbochargers are used to recover the lost power due to downsizing and, at the same time, reducing both engine pumping work and friction [131,132]. The downsizing effectiveness was demonstrated by [133], in which a 1.4-L ethanol engine was able to replace gasoline engines as big as 2.4 L and 3.0 L, keeping the original performance and improving fuel consumption.…”
Section: Recent Advances and Trends In Internal Combustion Enginesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combustion effects such as knock and autoignition were ignored throughout since the operating points selected had been demonstrated experimentally to be achievable. The air-to-fuel ratio (AFR) control in the model was implemented by using direct injection only, the injectors being of an AFR-targeting type, set to achieve stoichiometry at all operating conditions, in accordance with the project target (defined by Carey et al 4 ). The primary load control mechanisms of the engine were thus as follows: the throttle valve; engagement of the supercharger, and its drive ratio; the turbocharger wastegate; the supercharger bypass valve; the inlet and exhaust valve timings; the EGR circuit valve.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a starting point for the investigation, Minimap point 3 (1500 r/min; 104 N m (according to the work of Carey et al 4 ), equating to a brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) of 6.58 bar for the downsized engine) was chosen owing to its high NEDC weighting value (as defined above) and reasonable load requirement; it is highly unlikely that the supercharger would need to be engaged at loads lower than this. In order to find the optimal settings for the aforementioned load control mechanisms (valve timing, wastegate, etc.…”
Section: Design-of-experiments Parameter Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation