2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme gradient boosting model to estimate PM2.5 concentrations with missing-filled satellite data in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same methodology has been applied elsewhere [24,44,45]. More recently, machine-learning methods, such as random forests [20], gradient boosting [46], and neural network [47], have been developed due to their flexibility in handling nonlinear and interactive relationships among predictors and PM. This is a highly valued characteristic in situations where the joint relationship between daily particulate matter and multiple spatial and spatiotemporal predictors is only marginally understood.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same methodology has been applied elsewhere [24,44,45]. More recently, machine-learning methods, such as random forests [20], gradient boosting [46], and neural network [47], have been developed due to their flexibility in handling nonlinear and interactive relationships among predictors and PM. This is a highly valued characteristic in situations where the joint relationship between daily particulate matter and multiple spatial and spatiotemporal predictors is only marginally understood.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017b;Yu et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2019;Yao et al, 2019). Recently, with the release of MODIS 3-km DT aerosol products, the PM2.5 estimates can be improved to 3-km spatial resolution across China (You et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017a;He & Huang, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Xue et al, 2019).…”
Section: Comparison With Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For model performance, our newly developed STET model shows much higher accuracy with higher CV-R 2 values, smaller RMSE and MAE values than the statistical regression models (Table 2), e.g., the timely structure adaptive model (TSAM, Fang et al, 2016) model, the Gaussian model (Yu et al, 2017), 390 the Generalized Additive Model (GAM, Chen et al, 2018) model, and the GWR model (Ma et al, 2014;You et al, 2016), and the GTWR model (He and Huang, 2018). The STET model can also outperform most machine learning (ML) and deep learning approaches including the RF model (Chen et al, 2018;Wei et al, 2019e), the XGBoost model (Chen et al, 2019), the Geo-BPNN, GRNN and deep brief network (DBN) models (Li et al, 2017a(Li et al, , 2017b, and some optical combined models, e.g., the 395 Daily-GWR (D-GWR) model (He and Huang, 2018), the two-stage model (He and Huang, 2018;Ma et al, 2019;Yao et al, 2019), and the ML + GAM model (Xue et al, 2019). In addition, there are only a hanful of studies on the predictive power in PM2.5 concentrations across China.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical regression models, e.g., the multiple linear regression model, the linear mixed-effect model, the two-stage model and the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, have been widely used for applications due to their simplicity and versatility (Gupta and Christopher, 2009;Ma et al, 2014;Xiao et al, 2017;Yao et al, 2019). Artificial intelligence models mainly involve machine learning and deep learning models, e.g., the random forest (RF; Brokamp et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018;Wei et al, 2019a), the extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost; Chen et al, 2019), and the back-propagation and generalized regression neural networks (BRNN and GRNN; T. Li et al, 2017a). PM 2.5 is jointly affected by numerous factors, e.g., meteorological conditions, human activities and topography, showing great spatial and temporal heterogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it difficult for traditional physical and statistical regression approaches to accurately explain and construct PM 2.5 -AOD relationships, leading to poor PM 2.5 estimates. Despite their stronger data mining ability, most artificial intelligence approaches have been simplistically adopted in PM 2.5 predictions, neglecting the spatiotemporal characteristics of PM 2.5 (Brokamp et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018Chen et al, , 2019T. Li et al, 2017a;Xue et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%