“…For model performance, our newly developed STET model shows much higher accuracy with higher CV-R 2 values, smaller RMSE and MAE values than the statistical regression models (Table 2), e.g., the timely structure adaptive model (TSAM, Fang et al, 2016) model, the Gaussian model (Yu et al, 2017), 390 the Generalized Additive Model (GAM, Chen et al, 2018) model, and the GWR model (Ma et al, 2014;You et al, 2016), and the GTWR model (He and Huang, 2018). The STET model can also outperform most machine learning (ML) and deep learning approaches including the RF model (Chen et al, 2018;Wei et al, 2019e), the XGBoost model (Chen et al, 2019), the Geo-BPNN, GRNN and deep brief network (DBN) models (Li et al, 2017a(Li et al, , 2017b, and some optical combined models, e.g., the 395 Daily-GWR (D-GWR) model (He and Huang, 2018), the two-stage model (He and Huang, 2018;Ma et al, 2019;Yao et al, 2019), and the ML + GAM model (Xue et al, 2019). In addition, there are only a hanful of studies on the predictive power in PM2.5 concentrations across China.…”