2016
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2016.1169225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme learning machine-based surrogate model for analyzing system reliability of soil slopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pourkhosravani and Kalantari (2011) summarizes the current methods for slope stability evaluation, which were grouped into Limit Equilibrium (LE) methods, Numerical Analysis methods, Artificial Neural Networks and Limit Analysis methods. There are also approaches based on finite elements methods (Suchomel et al 2010), reliability analysis (Sivakumar Babu and Murthy 2005;Husein Malkawi et al 2000), as well as some methods making use of soft computing algorithms (Gavin and Xue 2009;Wang and Sassa 2005;Cheng and Hoang 2016;Ahangar-Asr et al 2010;Lu and Rosenbaum 2003;Sakellariou and Ferentinou 2005;Cheng et al 2012b;Yao et al 2008;Kang et al 2015;Kang et al 2016b; Kang and Li 2016;Kang et al 2016a;Kang et al 2017;Das et al 2011;Suman et al 2016). More recently, a new flexible statistical system was proposed by Pinheiro et al (2015), based on the assessment of different factors that affect the behavior of a given slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pourkhosravani and Kalantari (2011) summarizes the current methods for slope stability evaluation, which were grouped into Limit Equilibrium (LE) methods, Numerical Analysis methods, Artificial Neural Networks and Limit Analysis methods. There are also approaches based on finite elements methods (Suchomel et al 2010), reliability analysis (Sivakumar Babu and Murthy 2005;Husein Malkawi et al 2000), as well as some methods making use of soft computing algorithms (Gavin and Xue 2009;Wang and Sassa 2005;Cheng and Hoang 2016;Ahangar-Asr et al 2010;Lu and Rosenbaum 2003;Sakellariou and Ferentinou 2005;Cheng et al 2012b;Yao et al 2008;Kang et al 2015;Kang et al 2016b; Kang and Li 2016;Kang et al 2016a;Kang et al 2017;Das et al 2011;Suman et al 2016). More recently, a new flexible statistical system was proposed by Pinheiro et al (2015), based on the assessment of different factors that affect the behavior of a given slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial Neural Networks and Limit Analysis methods. There are also approaches based on finite elements methods (Suchomel et al 2010), reliability analysis (Sivakumar Babu and Murthy 2005;Husein Malkawi et al 2000), as well as some methods making use of soft computing algorithms (Gavin and Xue 2009;Cheng and Hoang 2016;Ahangar-Asr et al 2010;Lu and Rosenbaum 2003;Sakellariou and Ferentinou 2005;Cheng et al 2012b;Yao et al 2008;Kang et al 2015;Kang et al 2016b; Kang and Li 2016;Kang et al 2016a;Kang et al 2017;Das et al 2011;Suman et al 2016). More recently, a new flexible statistical system was proposed by Pinheiro et al (2015), based on the assessment of different factors that affect the behaviour of a given slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a differential evolutionary was utilized to solve the problem. Kang and Li [73] employed an ELM based surrogate model for the analysis of soil slope reliability. Artificial bee colony optimization was used to obtain the best values for the hidden weights and biases in ELM.…”
Section: Surrogate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the features with their labels were sent into ELM for training and classification. Lama and Gwak [78] proposed a PCA based method to extract features from brain MRIs and compared three [134], Hao and Liu [44], Kang and Li [73], Pavelski and Delgado [133], Ghiasi and Ghasemi [40] different classification algorithms in experiment: SVM, import vector machine (IVM) and regularized ELM. Simulation results suggested that regularized ELM performed best.…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%