2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004117000019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme residues of Dedekind zeta functions

Abstract: Abstract. In a family of S d+1 -fields (d = 2, 3, 4), we obtain the true upper and lower bound of the residues of Dedekind zeta functions except for a density zero set. For S5-fields, we need to assume the strong Artin conjecture. We also show that there exists an infinite family of number fields with the upper and lower bound, resp.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, following [2], we show that if n ≤ 5, except for a density zero set, the above are true upper and lower bounds. More precisely, we prove Ì ÓÖ Ñ 1.1º Let L(X) be the set of S n -fields (n ≤ 5) with X/2 ≤ d K ≤ X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, following [2], we show that if n ≤ 5, except for a density zero set, the above are true upper and lower bounds. More precisely, we prove Ì ÓÖ Ñ 1.1º Let L(X) be the set of S n -fields (n ≤ 5) with X/2 ≤ d K ≤ X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As in Proposition 3.1, we can show that for 0 < a < 1 4 , if L(s, ρ) is entire and is zero free in the rectangle Ê Ñ Ö 4.2º We would like to make corrections on [2]. They do not affect the results of the paper:…”
Section: Logarithmic Derivatives Inside the Critical Stripmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these cases, the error term in (1.1) with is on the order of Granville and Soundararajan used 1.2 with Dirichlet L -functions to study large character sums [6, equation (8.1)]. Cho and Kim applied it to Artin L -functions to obtain asymptotic bounds on Dedekind zeta residues [1, Proposition 3.1]. A bilinear relative of (1.2) appears in Selberg’s work on primes in short intervals [14, Lemma 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%