Extreme-value-model-based risk assessment for nuclear reactors

Abstract

The safety case for continuing operation of nuclear reactors requires reliable assessment of the likelihood of the coolant temperatures exiting the fuel channels exceeding certain critical levels. Temperature measurements are typically made at a fixed sample of fuel channels and used for reactor control. No sample measurements will exceed the predetermined control limit, whereas it is likely that some of the unobserved temperatures will exceed this limit. The challenge is to use the control measurements reliably to assess the risk of the critical temperature exceedance over all channels, while also accounting for the uncertainties in the risk estimation.A novel non-stationary extreme value mixture modelling technique is developed to provide rigorous extrapolation of the risk past the observed range of the sample data. The proposed technique builds upon previous deterministic and statistical approaches, while providing more accurate risk predictions with fuller account for uncertainties in the estimation. A spatial random effects model is used to capture the non-stationary spatial structure in the temperature variation across the reactor. Bayesian inference for the extreme value mixture model parameters is undertaken, which permits assessment of all sources of uncertainty including potential inclusion of expert prior information.

Fiscal shortage risk and the potential role for tropical storm insurance: evidence from the Caribbean

“…The justification for ignoring data below the threshold is that arguably extreme and non-extreme events are often caused by physically different forces, that the GPD is a flexible asymptotically justifiable model for the tail excesses, and that the information content of a sample containing extreme events typically consists of ‘low information’ non-extreme distributions and ‘high information’ extreme distributions, so that it is difficult to always ensure that the latter is given sufficient relative importance. However, as noted by Scarrott and MacDonald (2010), the weakness of the GPD threshold approach is that it does not take account of the uncertainty associated with the choice of threshold 13 . As a consequence, a number of extreme value mixture models have been proposed, which encapsulate the usual threshold model in combination with a component to capture the non-extreme distribution, also known as the ‘bulk distribution’ 14…”

Assessing the Impact of Typhoons on Rice Production in the Philippines

“…The traditional approach in this regard, has been to fit a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) to the data above a chosen threshold. However, as noted by Scarrott and MacDonald (2010), the weakness of the GPD threshold approach is that it does not take account of the uncertainty associated with the choice of threshold. As a consequence, a number of extreme value mixture models have been proposed, which encapsulate the usual threshold model in combination with a component capturing the nonextreme distribution, also known as the ''bulk distribution.''…”

BEPU robustness analysis via perturbed law-based sensitivity indices

“…As an example, safety analyses of nuclear power plants involving thermalhydraulic issues, such as a cold leg Intermediate-Break Loss-Of-Coolant Accident (IBLOCA) in a pressurized water reactor, can be treated using probabilistic and statistical approaches. 4,5 In the nuclear engineering community, when the computer code, that is used to simulate the involved physical phenomena, lies on realistic assumptions, the uncertainty quantification framework is known as the ''best-estimate plus uncertainty'' (BEPU) methodology. 6 It is widely recognized that global sensitivity analysis plays a key role in the BEPU methodology 7,8 and, more widely, in systems modeling and policy support.…”