2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.07.328302
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremely potent human monoclonal antibodies from convalescent Covid-19 patients

Abstract: SUMMARYHuman monoclonal antibodies are safe, preventive and therapeutic tools, that can be rapidly developed to help restore the massive health and economic disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. By single cell sorting 4277 SARS-CoV-2 spike protein specific memory B cells from 14 Covid-19 survivors, 453 neutralizing antibodies were identified and 220 of them were expressed as IgG. Up to 65,9% of monoclonals neutralized the wild type virus at a concentration of >500 ng/mL, 23,6% neutralized the virus in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RBD-specific mAb P008_108 is amongst the most potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs described so far with an IC 50 of 2.3 ng/mL against infectious virus (Andreano et al, 2020a). Although IC 50 values measured against pseudovirus correlated well with those measured against infectious virus ( r = 0.7694, p < 0.0001, Supplemental Figure S3A ), IC 50 values were typically 5-10 fold less potent against infectious virus as seen previously with patient sera (Seow et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBD-specific mAb P008_108 is amongst the most potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs described so far with an IC 50 of 2.3 ng/mL against infectious virus (Andreano et al, 2020a). Although IC 50 values measured against pseudovirus correlated well with those measured against infectious virus ( r = 0.7694, p < 0.0001, Supplemental Figure S3A ), IC 50 values were typically 5-10 fold less potent against infectious virus as seen previously with patient sera (Seow et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data pertaining to neutralization of S(G614) and S(D614) pseudoviruses have been reported in abundance. The majority of experiments demonstrate similar neutralization of both S(D614) and S(G614) PVs by antibodies or patient antisera directed against one or the other S protein variant [ 28 , 35 , 51 , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , [74] , [75] , [76] , [77] , [78] ], while in some cases S(G614) exhibited greater susceptibility to neutralization [ 51 , 57 ]. Similar neutralization or greater susceptibility of the S(G614) variant have been reproduced with live SARS-CoV-2 as well [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, establishing correlations between RBD-specific IgG levels and plasma neutralizing activity only provides indirect evidence of a link between the two parameters. Moreover, demonstrating that RBD is a target of neutralizing antibodies (19)(20)(21)(22) does not directly address the relative contribution of RBD-specific antibodies to the overall plasma neutralizing activity. To directly test the link between RBD specificity and the antibodymediated ability of plasma to neutralize the virus, we depleted RBD-specific antibodies from seropositive plasma samples, and, as a comparator, we also depleted viral Nucleocapsid (N)-specific antibodies, and then tested the effects on neutralizing activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%