To the Editor We read with interest the article by Wu et al 1 on ocular findings in coronavirus disease 2019 . We wish to understand more about the study in the following aspects.First, the authors reported conjunctivitis in 12 of 38 patients with COVID-19 in a consecutive case series. Notably, the prevalence of conjunctival congestion was merely 0.8% (9 of 1099 patients) in another larger study from China. 2 Could the authors clarify if they are implying that the conjunctivitis was associated with COVID-19 affecting the conjunctiva (ie, viral conjunctivitis) or nonspecific signs from conjunctival congestion or chemosis from COVID-19's systemic manifestations, 3 intensive care, 4 or other benign causes (eg, dry eyes, conjunctival irritation)?Second, 2 patients had positive conjunctival swab results, with each having different ocular manifestations. What do the authors hypothesize are the infective mechanisms? For example, could it be direct conjunctival invasion or infection via nasopharyngeal secretions?Third, could the authors provide detailed clinical features of suspected cases? Do they have any clinical photographs? Also, how were the assessments performed, and what instruments were used to assess the conjunctivitis (eg, slitlamp biomicroscopy, portable slitlamp, or handheld flashlight)? The authors reported 4 features: epiphora, chemosis, hyperemia, and secretions. However, each was used in isolation to diagnose conjunctivitis, which may not be specific. Could the authors indicate if there were supportive features, such as subjective complaints (itch and pain), the character of the discharge, and any papillary or follicular reaction of the palpebral conjunctiva?Lastly, could the authors provide more about the course and outcome of the reported cases of conjunctivitis? What treatments were used? Were there any ophthalmic sequelae, such as corneal, episcleral, or scleral involvement? We thank the authors for considering these clarifications and providing some additional information.