The behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by early predominant behavioral changes, mimicking the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, which is characterized by social cognition deficits and altered biometric responses to socioemotional cues. These functions remain understudied in the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease. We investigated multiple social cognition components(i.e., emotion recognition, empathy, social norms and moral reasoning), using the Ekman-60-faces-test, Interpersonal-Reactivity-Index, empathy eliciting videos, Social-Norms-Questionnaire and moral dilemmas, while measuring eye-movements and galvanic skin response. We compared 12 patients with the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease with patients with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia(n = 14), typical Alzheimer’s disease(n = 13) and individuals with subjective cognitive decline(n = 13), using ANCOVAs and age and sex adjusted post hoc testing.
Patients with the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease(40.1 ± 8.6) showed lower scores on the Ekman-60-faces-test compared to individuals with subjective cognitive decline(49.7 ± 5.0, p < 0.001), and patients with typical Alzheimer’s disease(46.2 ± 5.3, p = 0.05) and higher scores compared to patients with behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia(32.4 ± 7.3, p = 0.002). Eye-tracking during the Ekman-60-faces-test revealed no differences in dwell time on the eyes(all p > 0.05), but patients with the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease(18.7 ± 9.5%) and frontotemporal dementia(19.4 ± 14.3%) spent significantly less dwell time on the mouth than individuals with subjective cognitive decline(30.7 ± 11.6%, p < 0.01) and patients with typical Alzheimer’s disease(32.7 ± 12.1%, p < 0.01). Patients with the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease(11.3 ± 4.6) exhibited lower scores on the Interpersonal-Reactivity-Index compared with individuals with subjective cognitive decline(15.6 ± 3.1, p = 0.05) and similar scores to patients with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia(8.7 ± 5.6, p = 0.19) and typical Alzheimer’s disease(13.0 ± 3.2, p = 0.43). The galvanic skin response to empathy eliciting videos did not differ between groups(all p > 0.05). Patients with the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease(16.0 ± 1.6) and frontotemporal dementia(15.2 ± 2.2) showed lower scores on the Social-Norms-Questionnaire than patients with typical Alzheimer’s disease(17.8 ± 2.1, p < 0.05) and individuals with subjective cognitive decline(18.3 ± 1.4, p < 0.05). No group differences were observed in scores on moral dilemmas(all p > 0.05), while only patients with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia(0.9 ± 1.1) showed a lower galvanic skin response during personal dilemmas compared with subjective cognitive decline(3.4 ± 3.3 peaks per minute, p = 0.01).
Concluding, patients with the behavioral variant of Alzheimer’s disease showed a similar though milder social cognition profile and a similar eye-tracking signature to patients with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and greater social cognition impairments and divergent eye-movement patterns compared with patients with typical Alzheimer’s disease. Our results suggest reduced attention to salient facial features in these phenotypes, potentially contributing to their emotion recognition deficits.