2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye-gaze Tracking Based Interaction in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research on comparing eye gaze controlled interfaces with other modalities is mainly limited to desktop computing, and, except for a few cases involving novice users [49], generally traditional input devices like mouse or touchscreen worked better than gaze controlled systems [45,50]. Researchers already explored different target predictions or intent recognition techniques for reducing pointing times.…”
Section: Existing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on comparing eye gaze controlled interfaces with other modalities is mainly limited to desktop computing, and, except for a few cases involving novice users [49], generally traditional input devices like mouse or touchscreen worked better than gaze controlled systems [45,50]. Researchers already explored different target predictions or intent recognition techniques for reducing pointing times.…”
Section: Existing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed survey on gaze-controlled interfaces can be found elsewhere Biswas, Prabhakar, Rajesh, Pandit, & Halder, 2017;Zhai, Morimoto, & Ihde, 1999). Existing research on comparing eye-gaze-controlled interfaces with other modalities is mainly limited to desktop computing and, except a few cases involving novice users (Biswas & Langdon, 2014), generally traditional input devices like mouse or touchscreen worked better than gaze-controlled systems (Vertegaal, 2008;Ware & Mikaelian, 1987). A few recent studies on automotive user interfaces found gaze-controlled interfaces worked worse than (Poitschke, Laquai, Stamboliev, & Rigoll, 2011) or similar to (Biswas et al, 2017) touchscreen in terms of pointing and selection times although with higher rate of errors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experimental verification that eye-controlled reading, like that associated with Text 2.0, improves reading performance is lacking and related reading behaviours are not well understood. Biswas and Langdon (2014) studied how users interact with an eye-gaze tracker, which has the potential to be more intuitive than a mouse or touchpad. They found that novice users can point and select in an online shopping task significantly faster using the eye-gaze tracker than using the mouse, but the difference in cognitive load was statistically non-significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%