Eye Glance Behavior of Van and Passenger Car Drivers During Lane Change Decision Phase

Tijerina, Louis; Garrott, W. Riley; Stoltzfus, Duane; Parmer, Edwin

doi:10.3141/1937-06

Cited by 40 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2005, Louis Tijerina of the United States researched the truck and car drivers view characteristics in the lane change decision-making process [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driver characteristics in the lane change process

Tian

2011

2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the lane change process, the different types of drivers have different behavior characteristics, the same driver in different road environments has not the same behavior, in order to design lane change model based on driver characteristics, it is necessary to study drivers' lane change characteristics. With real vehicle data, analyzed the lane change characteristics of the same driver on Beijing highway, 5th rings, 4th rings, 3rd rings and different driver's lane change characteristics on the same road environment. The results show that in the lane change process, the driver expected goal is to control the total lane change time near the expected value, and obtain the corresponding lateral velocity and acceleration through controlling the steering wheel.

show abstract

“…In 2005, Louis Tijerina of the United States researched the truck and car drivers view characteristics in the lane change decision-making process [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driver characteristics in the lane change process

Tian

2011

2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These features do not seem to directly indicate higher level of threat which was presented by the “direct look” of the person, because the shortening of the assessment duration ( response time ) was the same for the high-threat responses (fly away) and for the low-threat responses (remain) by prey. Gaze, face and head, as well as their movements, contain important clues that may allow to predict the actions of the subject [44]–[47], suggesting that they may also provide crucial information to the prey about the predator’s future actions. Hence, our results suggest that the effect of direct gaze (looking at the prey) of the predator on the behavior of the prey may extend beyond the classical issue of indicating the threat level [37]–[43]: the direct look from the predator may cause a general increase in information transmitted from the predator to the prey about the predator’s future actions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, prey seem to treat the direct gaze or direct “looking” of the predators as an indicator of higher predation risk [37]–[43]. However, it has been documented that gaze, face and head, as well as their movements, may also contain important clues that may allow humans or computer algorithms to predict the actions of the subject [44]–[47] regardless of how threatening the action may be. These findings suggest that gaze and face may provide crucial information to the prey about predator’s future actions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct Look from a Predator Shortens the Risk-Assessment Time by Prey

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decision making process is an important component of information use by animals and has already been studied in natural situations. Decision making takes time, which is expressed as a cost in evolutionary explanations of decision making abilities of animals. However, the duration of information assessment and decision making process has not been measured in a natural situation. Here, we use responses of wild magpies (Pica pica) to predictably approaching humans to demonstrate that, regardless of whether the bird perceived high (decided to fly away) or low (resumed foraging) threat level, the bird assessed the situation faster when approaching humans looked directly at it than when the humans were not directly looking at it. This indicates that prey is able to extract more information about the predator’s intentions and to respond sooner when the predator is continuously (“intently”) looking at the prey. The results generally illustrate how an increase of information available to an individual leads to a shorter assessment and decision making process, confirming one of central tenets of psychology of information use in a wild bird species in its natural habitat.

show abstract

“…When the predicted vehicle gets to the lane change point, the accuracy increases up to 95%. According to related researches [29], the lane changing time on highway is generally between 3.5 and 6.5 s, and an average implementation of a complete lane change process is 5 s. Assume that the time before and after lane change point both take 2.5 s, that means our model can make a pre-judgment almost before the drivers start to change the lane. It is because the information fed to the model includes the states of the predicted vehicle and its surroundings, so the model can 'observe' the scenario from the perspective of the predicted vehicle and makes reasonable prediction.…”

Section: Evaluation For Intention Predictionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi‐modal vehicle trajectory prediction based on mutual information

Cong

2020

IET intell. transp. syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eye Glance Behavior of Van and Passenger Car Drivers During Lane Change Decision Phase

Cited by 40 publications

References 7 publications

Driver characteristics in the lane change process

Driver characteristics in the lane change process

Direct Look from a Predator Shortens the Risk-Assessment Time by Prey

Multi‐modal vehicle trajectory prediction based on mutual information

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About