2012
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye lens radiation exposure to interventional cardiologists: a retrospective assessment of cumulativedoses

Abstract: Radiation dose to the eye lens is a crucial issue for interventional cardiologists (ICs) who are exposed during the procedures they perform. This paper presents a retrospective assessment of the cumulative eye lens doses of ICs enrolled in the O'CLOC study for Occupational Cataracts and Lens Opacities in interventional Cardiology. Information on the workload in the catheterisation laboratory, radiation protection equipment, eye lens dose per procedure and dose reduction factors associated with eye-protective e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] While there is good awareness and understanding of radiation risks to staff from IR procedures, a lack of reliable values for eye doses has persisted. Recent publications have attempted to address this and have established that dose to the eyes can be significant, particularly if the X-ray tube is positioned over the patient table and if no ceiling-mounted lead screen or lead glasses are used; [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] however, more data on lens dose, particularly in terms of H p (3) (personal dose equivalent at 3 mm in soft tissue), is required. 15,16 Revised International Commission on Radiological Protection dose limit In April 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) published a statement on tissue reactions recommending an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv per annum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] While there is good awareness and understanding of radiation risks to staff from IR procedures, a lack of reliable values for eye doses has persisted. Recent publications have attempted to address this and have established that dose to the eyes can be significant, particularly if the X-ray tube is positioned over the patient table and if no ceiling-mounted lead screen or lead glasses are used; [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] however, more data on lens dose, particularly in terms of H p (3) (personal dose equivalent at 3 mm in soft tissue), is required. 15,16 Revised International Commission on Radiological Protection dose limit In April 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) published a statement on tissue reactions recommending an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv per annum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is necessary to consider the effects of the radiation protection equipment used in the HOR, such as suspended shields or lead eyeglasses, by adding dose reduction factors [29,30]. If it were necessary to know finger doses more accurately, wrist or ring TLDs are useful in this way [31,32] whereas Hp(3) calibration is recommended for the study of eye lens doses [33].…”
Section: Staff Individual Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, areas of the body not protected by the lead apron may receive significant radiation doses from scattered X-rays (Kim et al, 2008, Bedetti et al, 2008, Rehani and Ortiz-Lopez, 2006, ICRP a , 2000, UNSCEAR, 2000, ICRP b , 2007, Trianni et al, 2005and Delichas et al, 2003. Thus, they are potentially at risk of developing radiation-induced cataracts, and complexity of invasive procedures (Rehani et al, 2011, Jacob et al, 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%