2019
DOI: 10.3390/vision3020032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye Movements in Medical Image Perception: A Selective Review of Past, Present and Future

Abstract: The eye movements of experts, reading medical images, have been studied for many years. Unlike topics such as face perception, medical image perception research needs to cope with substantial, qualitative changes in the stimuli under study due to dramatic advances in medical imaging technology. For example, little is known about how radiologists search through 3D volumes of image data because they simply did not exist when earlier eye tracking studies were performed. Moreover, improvements in the affordability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eye gaze movements that did not fall into simple drilling or scanning categories were classified in the hybrid category denoting simultaneous scanning and drilling. This has been termed scan drilling or “scrilling.” [ 10 ] In this study, modes of scrilling were observed that required subcategories. These were coined as roaming (the gaze is allowed to move about without predetermined design while drilling through the image stack) and zigzagging (the gaze moves across and back while drilling through the image stack).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Eye gaze movements that did not fall into simple drilling or scanning categories were classified in the hybrid category denoting simultaneous scanning and drilling. This has been termed scan drilling or “scrilling.” [ 10 ] In this study, modes of scrilling were observed that required subcategories. These were coined as roaming (the gaze is allowed to move about without predetermined design while drilling through the image stack) and zigzagging (the gaze moves across and back while drilling through the image stack).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By using these behavioral measurements, much previous literature has shown that we are genuine experts at visual search from extremely complex natural scenes, still outperforming state-of-the-art computer vision systems [4]. How is this high performance achieved?…”
Section: Figure 2 An Example Of An Experimental Sequence To Test Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than the prior knowledge or expectation, there are various factors that can effectively guide the top-down processing in visual search, as summarized in Figure 6. Compared to any other AI systems, the human brain seems to be much better at utilizing and combining these factors for top-down processing even before most of the scene objects and details are recognized and consciously processed [4]. Thus, the top-down processing is the domain in which machine such as AI and computer vision systems cannot simulate human performance yet.…”
Section: Figure 2 An Example Of An Experimental Sequence To Test Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the central hypothesis is that radiomics will disrupt current interpretative-subjective imaging description by providing definitive-objective imaging characterization [32]. This is inevitable when machines are compared to humans [33][34][35][36] for specific tasks. The workflow [37] begins with the acquisition of images/data (including QA and curation if necessary), the identification of regions of interest (automatically or manually), the pre-processing, extraction of features (handcrafted or deep), and post-processing of features, and machine learning (training of application) is then performed, culminating in a link to clinically actionable insight (diagnosis [38], prognosis [39], theragnosis [40], or follow-up [41]).…”
Section: You Can Only Treat What You See Buzzword Radiomics: the Bridmentioning
confidence: 99%