2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0027488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye of the beholder: The individual and dyadic contributions of empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort to relationship satisfaction.

Abstract: This study examined links between two distinct facets of empathy—empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort—and one's own and one's partner's relationship satisfaction. Using a video recall procedure, participants (n = 156 couples in committed relationships) reported on their own emotions and their perceptions of partners' emotions and partners' empathic intentions during moments of high affect in laboratory-based discussions of upsetting events. Partners' data were correlated as a measure of how accurate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
97
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on MFT, this strengthens the view that purity concerns, which may be tightly associated with religious norms about sexual restraint and chastity, are the most crucial in predicting a variety of relationship morality norms. Whereas relationships research has often focused on equity and dyadic fairness norms (e.g., Bartz & Lydon, 2008), as well as empathy and perceived harm (e.g., Cohen, Schulz, Weiss, & Waldinger, 2012), the current data underscore the importance of using a perspective that goes beyond these variables. It appears that sensitivity to purity violations may be the best predictor of the extent to which people perceive behaviors as morally wrong in a relational context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Building on MFT, this strengthens the view that purity concerns, which may be tightly associated with religious norms about sexual restraint and chastity, are the most crucial in predicting a variety of relationship morality norms. Whereas relationships research has often focused on equity and dyadic fairness norms (e.g., Bartz & Lydon, 2008), as well as empathy and perceived harm (e.g., Cohen, Schulz, Weiss, & Waldinger, 2012), the current data underscore the importance of using a perspective that goes beyond these variables. It appears that sensitivity to purity violations may be the best predictor of the extent to which people perceive behaviors as morally wrong in a relational context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, positive perceptions of partners, including their empathy, has been linked to higher quality of the romantic relationship, especially among women (Busby & Gardner, 2008;Cohen, Schulz, Weiss, & Waldinger, 2012;Long & Andrews, 1990). Moreover, self-empathy has been found to be a strong predictor of whether or not one views their partner as empathic (Kazmierczak, 2008(Kazmierczak, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Further, perceived empathic effort appears to be more strongly associated with couple relationship satisfaction than accuracy per se(Cohen et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%