Eye-Tracking in the Study of Visual Expertise: Methodology and Approaches in Medicine

Fox, Sharon; Faulkner-Jones, Beverly E.

doi:10.14786/flr.v5i3.258

Cited by 30 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The article by Fox and Faulkner-Jones (2017) provides a brief historical overview of eye tracking. For a broader view, we would like to refer the reader to the informative and entertaining book by Wade and Tatler (2005) on the history of eye tracking.…”

Section: Eye Trackingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another important aspect that Fox and Faulkner-Jones (2017) point out is the lack in research on 3D and dynamic medical images. We fully agree with that, but would like to point towards research not mentioned by these authors, i.e., by Bertram, Helle, Kaakinen, and Svedström (2013) on CT images and our own research on interactive digital pathology slides (Jaarsma et al, 2016;Jaarsma, Jarodzka, Nap, Van Merriënboer, & Boshuizen, 2015;Jaarsma et al, 2014) and on patient-video cases (Balslev et al, 2012).…”

Section: Eye Trackingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On that note, we would like to point towards the idea of using eye movements of experts in instructional videos (Van Gog, Jarodzka, Scheiter, Gerjets, & Paas, 2009) and its successful application to medicine (e.g., Jarodzka, Balslev, et al, 2012). On a final note, it is important to mention that Fox and Faulkner-Jones (2017) have discussed many visual search models, but did not make the connection to current models on medical expertise and its development (Jarodzka, Boshuizen, et al, 2012). However, as we already argue elsewhere , this connection is crucial for theoretical development.…”

Section: Eye Trackingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Unboxing the Black Box of Visual Expertise in Medicine

Jarodzka

Boshuizen

2017

FLR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Eye Trackingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Eye Trackingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Eye Trackingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Unboxing the Black Box of Visual Expertise in Medicine

Jarodzka

Boshuizen

2017

FLR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A hallmark of expertise is that experts make better and faster decisions than novices (Chase & Simon, 1973;de Groot, 1946de Groot, /1965Gobet, 2015) and experts in medical image perception are no exception (for an excellent review of eye movements and visual expertise in medicine see Reingold & Sheridan, 2011; see also this special issue : Fox & Faulkner-Jones, 2017;Szulewski, Kelton, & Howes, 2017). Moreover, examining the expertise-related differences in eye movement patterns reveals the types of visual processing and cognitive strategies that may underlie such expert performance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Flash-Preview Moving Window Paradigm: Unpacking Visual Expertise One Glimpse at a Time

Litchfield¹,

Donovan²

2017

FLR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How we make sense of what we see and where best to look is shaped by our experience, our current task goals and how we first perceive our environment. An established way of demonstrating these factors work together is to study how eye movement patterns change as a function of expertise and to observe how experts can solve complex tasks after only very brief glances at a domain-specific image. The primary focus of this paper is to introduce an innovative gaze-contingent method called the 'Flash-Preview Moving Window' (FPMW) paradigm (Castelhano & Henderson, 2007), which was recently developed to understand our shared expertise in scene perception and how our first glimpse of a scene is used to guide our eye movement behaviour. In keeping with this special issue on visual expertise and medicine, this paper will highlight how the FPMW paradigm has the potential to resolve long-standing theoretical issues as to how, right from the very first glance, experts are able to process domain-specific images and guide their eye movements better than novices. Since FPMW is a gaze-contingent eye-tracking method, the paper will first outline the current methodological and theoretical frontier, and how the FPMW paradigm bridges established methods used to investigate visual expertise. The paper will discuss a recent example in which the FPMW was employed to investigate medical image perception expertise for the first time (Litchfield & Donovan, 2016), and by discussing the insights and challenges this method offers, this should ultimately deepen our understanding of visual expertise.

show abstract

“…Each article is devoted to one approach (or to a combination of approaches) and discusses its affordances and constraints for empirically analyzing visual expertise. These approaches are: cognitive-neurosciences (Gegenfurtner et al, 2017b), receiver operating characteristics analysis (Krupsinki, 2017), eye tracking (Fox & Faulkner-Jones, 2017), pupillometry (Szulewski, Kelton, & Howes, 2017), the flash-preview moving window paradigm (Litchfield & Donovan, 2017), the combination of eye tracking data and verbal report data (Helle, 2017), the use of interviews and verbal protocols (Van de Wiel, 2017), ethnomethodology (Ivarsson, 2017), and the expert performance approach (Williams, Fawyer, & Hodges, 2017). The special issue closes with two commentaries (Boucheix, 2017;Jarodzka & Boshuizen, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%