2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-1472-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye-Tracking Movements—A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that eye-tracking can provide valuable insights into how individuals engage with multimedia learning materials, revealing gender-based disparities in information processing preferences (Mézière et al, 2023). Additionally, research has demonstrated the effectiveness of eye-tracking in analyzing attention patterns of young individuals towards environmental advertising and journalistic texts, highlighting the cognitive effects of different media formats (Lobodenko et al, 2023;Saini et al, 2022). Overall, the use of eye-tracking technology offers a promising alternative for measuring cognitive processes during reading comprehension and multimedia learning, providing detailed and objective data for understanding individual differences in information processing strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that eye-tracking can provide valuable insights into how individuals engage with multimedia learning materials, revealing gender-based disparities in information processing preferences (Mézière et al, 2023). Additionally, research has demonstrated the effectiveness of eye-tracking in analyzing attention patterns of young individuals towards environmental advertising and journalistic texts, highlighting the cognitive effects of different media formats (Lobodenko et al, 2023;Saini et al, 2022). Overall, the use of eye-tracking technology offers a promising alternative for measuring cognitive processes during reading comprehension and multimedia learning, providing detailed and objective data for understanding individual differences in information processing strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%