2018
DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v13i05.8109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye Tracking Technology in Detecting the Switch Cost in the Intra-sentential Code-Switching Contexts

Abstract: Abstract-Switch cost and cost site have been controversial issues in the code-switching studies. This research conducted an eye tracking experiment on eight bilingual subjects to measure their switch cost and cost site in comprehending the intra-sentential code-switching (Chinese and English) and the unilingual (pure Chinese) stimuli. The English words and their Chinese translations or equivalents were assumed as the key words in either a unilingual or an intra-sentential code-switching paragraph. These key wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It tracks the paths of eye movements and records the points of attention that a reader pays to individual words. The first use of eye-tracker in reading and other information processing tasks was carried out by scholars as Rayner (Wu & Xi, 2018).…”
Section: 'Eye Tracking Device'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It tracks the paths of eye movements and records the points of attention that a reader pays to individual words. The first use of eye-tracker in reading and other information processing tasks was carried out by scholars as Rayner (Wu & Xi, 2018).…”
Section: 'Eye Tracking Device'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, a lack of research on whether complex hybrid words are processed in a similar manner. While Wu and Xi [ 10 ] conducted an experiment on procession acronyms, words, and phrases with features from multiple languages, their sample size consisting of 8 participants was low. This, combined with the diverse stimulus set, did not allow firm conclusions to be drawn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%