2014
DOI: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye-voice span during rapid automatized naming: evidence of reduced automaticity in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and their siblings

Abstract: BackgroundIndividuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their parents demonstrate impaired performance in rapid automatized naming (RAN), a task that recruits a variety of linguistic and executive processes. Though the basic processes that contribute to RAN differences remain unclear, eye-voice relationships, as measured through eye tracking, can provide insight into cognitive and perceptual processes contributing to RAN performance. For example, in RAN, eye-voice span (EVS), the distance ahead the eyes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is typically found, RAN completion time decreased from Object to Color to Letter to Digit RAN (Bos, Zijlstra & Spelberg, 2002; Cronin & Carver, 1998; Denckla & Rudel, 1974; Hogan-Brown et al, 2014; Meyer, Wood, Hart, & Felton, 1998; Misra, et al, 2004)). Average EVS was significantly lower for the Object and Color RANs than for the Letter RAN, which was lower than for the Digit RAN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…As is typically found, RAN completion time decreased from Object to Color to Letter to Digit RAN (Bos, Zijlstra & Spelberg, 2002; Cronin & Carver, 1998; Denckla & Rudel, 1974; Hogan-Brown et al, 2014; Meyer, Wood, Hart, & Felton, 1998; Misra, et al, 2004)). Average EVS was significantly lower for the Object and Color RANs than for the Letter RAN, which was lower than for the Digit RAN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Two of these components are processing speed (more automatic processes are faster; see Cohen et al, 1992; Moors and De Houwer, 2006; Moors, 2016) and release from attentional control, which in turn affords immunity from competing processes, or immunity from interference (Cohen et al, 1992). The relation between automaticity and EVS has been supported by findings that dyslexic subjects, who lack automaticity, show decreased EVS values compared to controls (De Luca et al, 2013), and the same goes for autistic subjects (Hogan-Brown et al, 2014). The idea that EVS reflects automaticity is also supported by findings that EVS predicts naming velocity for automatized processes such as digit naming, but not for less automatized processes such as dice naming (Pan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The idea that EVS reflects automaticity is also supported by findings that EVS predicts naming velocity for automatized processes such as digit naming, but not for less automatized processes such as dice naming (Pan et al, 2013). In these studies, the link between automaticity and EVS has been framed around the processing speed component of automaticity (Pan et al, 2013; Hogan-Brown et al, 2014; Laubrock and Kliegl, 2015): it has been argued that the speed (automaticity) of print-to-sound conversion is key to EVS. The potential role of the other automaticity component, immunity from interference, on EVS has remained unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, children with ASD and their parents have been shown to have an impaired performance in rapid automatized naming. Siblings of patients had intermediate performances when compared with controls [62,63].…”
Section: Statusmentioning
confidence: 87%