2017
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2017-000079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eyes and stroke: the visual aspects of cerebrovascular disease

Abstract: A large portion of the central nervous system is dedicated to vision and therefore strokes have a high likelihood of involving vision in some way. Vision loss can be the most disabling residual effect after a cerebral infarction. Transient vision problems can likewise be a harbinger of stroke and prompt evaluation after recognition of visual symptoms can prevent future vascular injury. In this review, we discuss the visual aspects of stroke. First, anatomy and the vascular supply of the visual system are consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the reportedly good test-retest reliability of OCT und mfVEP (32-34) we cannot rule out sampling artifacts resulting from the relatively small sample size of our study. Another limitation is the inclusion of patients with different extensions of PCA infarctions identified by MRI or CT scans, which additionally might miss smaller lesions in other brain areas, especially in the case of CT. We therefore cannot completely rule out concomitant additional direct ischemic insults to the optic tract and LGN (35,36) beyond the infarctions identified. Such infarctions could have caused the observed retinal layer changes by direct retrograde axonal degeneration, rather than by TRD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the reportedly good test-retest reliability of OCT und mfVEP (32-34) we cannot rule out sampling artifacts resulting from the relatively small sample size of our study. Another limitation is the inclusion of patients with different extensions of PCA infarctions identified by MRI or CT scans, which additionally might miss smaller lesions in other brain areas, especially in the case of CT. We therefore cannot completely rule out concomitant additional direct ischemic insults to the optic tract and LGN (35,36) beyond the infarctions identified. Such infarctions could have caused the observed retinal layer changes by direct retrograde axonal degeneration, rather than by TRD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, one would expect that these lesions would have occurred in a random distribution on both the ipsilateral and contralateral side of the PCA infarction rather than only on the ipsilateral side where we observed the degeneration in our study. In addition, patients with ischemic stroke may have a considerable risk of concomitant ischemic damage to the anterior visual pathways based on their vascular risk factors (36). However, as stated above, this would affect the anterior visual pathway of both eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papilooedema may be present due to the brain oedema secondary to stroke. (21). Posterior pole hemorrhages (Terson syndrome) as a result of intracranial hemorrhages may be present (22).…”
Section: Causes Of Binocular Diplopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vascular diseases affecting the eye are multifactorial in origin, with many risk factors contributing to their onset. Systemic risk factors include nocturnal arterial hypotension, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, ischemic heart disease, blood loss, atherosclerosis, sleep apnea syndrome, cardiovascular disorders, tobacco smoking, obesity, atrial fibrillation, hyperhomocysteinemia, varicose veins, and coagulation disorders (activated protein C resistance or factor V Leiden mutation), among others [3,[8][9][10][11]. Ocular risk factors include elevated intraocular pressure, glaucoma, a small and crowded disc, or optic disc drusen that can influence the optic nerve head blood supply [9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%