2015
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1058955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eyewitness memory: The impact of a negative mood during encoding and/or retrieval upon recall of a non-emotive event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Bäuml and Kuhbandner (2007) found that participants with a negative mood experienced less memory interference and showed better memory. Similar observations were made with regards to eyewitness testimony (Thorley, Dewhurst, Abel, & Knott, 2016).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Also, Bäuml and Kuhbandner (2007) found that participants with a negative mood experienced less memory interference and showed better memory. Similar observations were made with regards to eyewitness testimony (Thorley, Dewhurst, Abel, & Knott, 2016).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…One could assume that this finding would generalize to other associations between the Ladder and other variables and conclude that researchers interested in subjective wellbeing, in particular in the associations between different demographic factors and wellbeing, could rely on MTurk samples without much concern. On the other hand, the observation that the MTurk respondents have considerably lower levels of evaluative subjective well-being could impact other types of research, such as studies focused on recall of negatively valenced events or cognitive processing tasks, which can be influenced by negative affect (Egidi & Caramazza, 2014;Thorley, Dewhurst, Abel, & Knott, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, mood dependence has been shown to be strengthened with freerecall tasks that place greater reliance on participants' internal contextual resources (i.e., mood) as opposed to external cues, allowing participants to generate their own target events during encoding (generative encoding), and providing longer delays between encoding and retrieval (Eich, 1995;Forgas & Eich, 2012). Recent empirical demonstrations of mood-dependent memory have further improved confidence in the reliability and validity of demonstrating this phenomenon in the lab (Thorley et al, 2016;Xie & Zhang, 2018).…”
Section: Mood and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%