1997
DOI: 10.1080/741941481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eyewitness Performance in Cognitive and Structured Interviews

Abstract: This paper addresses two methodological and theoretical questions relating to the Cognitive Interview (CI), which previous research has found to increase witness recall in interviews. (1) What are the effects of the CI mnemonic techniques when communication techniques are held constant? (2) How do trained interviewers compare with untrained interviewers? In this study, witnesses (college students) viewed a short film clip of a shooting and were questioned by interviewers (research assistants) trained in conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 73% of the errors in the current study were in response to specific questions about the face and perhaps our questions had the effect of lowering response criterion as is typical when recall is probed with questions (e.g. Memon et al, 1997). Despite the fact that our questioning procedure 'forced' errors in descriptions, we did not get a significant overshadowing effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…However, 73% of the errors in the current study were in response to specific questions about the face and perhaps our questions had the effect of lowering response criterion as is typical when recall is probed with questions (e.g. Memon et al, 1997). Despite the fact that our questioning procedure 'forced' errors in descriptions, we did not get a significant overshadowing effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The specific risk factors noted do, however, provide numerous clues or starting points for secondary interviews of cases where the use of specific questions could more effectively identify or eliminate suspected sources. This type of approach has proven useful in interviews to identify sexual partners (5), is part of the cognitive interview technique used in criminal investigations (22), and is being applied to food-borne disease investigations (18). PFGE cluster N (Sm0046:Kp0026) is indistinguishable from a familial common-source outbreak linked to precooked sausages distributed by a particular butcher in Christchurch (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following earlier research in the field (Milne & Bull, 2002;Memon, Bull, & Smith, 1995;Memon, Wark, Holley, Bull, & Köhnken, 1997), the details were then classified into four categories: person (for example, man with the gun was fat), action (e.g. man 2 runs toward the woman), object (white car) and location (deserted street).…”
Section: Coding and Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%