14th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-2454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F-16/generic store carriage load predictions at transonic Mach numbers using TranAir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was for the F-16/Generic Finned Store; the conference took place in New Orleans in the summer of 1996 (ACFD Challenge I). For this meeting lower order (4) solutions again exhibited good agreement with Euler and Navier Stokes codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This was for the F-16/Generic Finned Store; the conference took place in New Orleans in the summer of 1996 (ACFD Challenge I). For this meeting lower order (4) solutions again exhibited good agreement with Euler and Navier Stokes codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In the store certification process, analyses mainly focus on captive carry aerodynamic loads, thermal loads on electronic equipments and vibration levels on the store and aircraft. 1 Chief Research Engineer, Aerodynamics Division, osman.basoglu@sage.tubitak.gov.tr, 2 Ph.D., Chief Research Engineer, Aerodynamics Division, hediye.atik@sage.tubitak.gov.tr. 3 Ph.D., Chief Research Engineer, Mechatronic Division, erdinc.yildiz @sage.tubitak.gov.tr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several challenges for aerodynamic predictions of carriage loads and trajectories of different stores by using CFD analysis. Some of them may be listed as F-16/Generic Finned Store trajectory prediction challenge [2,3,4,5,6] , F-18/Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) trajectory prediction challenge [7,8,9,10] and finally F-18C/MK-83 store transonic pressure prediction challenge for which comparisons were made with Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP) data taken from flight tests [11] . All challenges showed that, numerical methods are mature enough to predict the store trajectories even with an Euler mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%