2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F inding the O ptimal volume and intensity of R esistance T raining E xercise for Type 2 Diabetes: The FORTE Study, a Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority of trials included in this study did not control for the total volume of exercise being performed. Indeed, a recent study in individuals with T2D demonstrated that, when matched for exercise volume, there was no significant difference in glycemic control with high- or low-intensity RET (75 vs. 50% of 1RM, respectively) (Yang et al, 2017). Further work is needed to confirm these results; nonetheless, this work provides rationale that older adults with T2D (or at high risk for developing T2D) should simply concentrate on performing RET without having to worry about the exercise intensity.…”
Section: Resistance Exercise Training and Type 2 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the majority of trials included in this study did not control for the total volume of exercise being performed. Indeed, a recent study in individuals with T2D demonstrated that, when matched for exercise volume, there was no significant difference in glycemic control with high- or low-intensity RET (75 vs. 50% of 1RM, respectively) (Yang et al, 2017). Further work is needed to confirm these results; nonetheless, this work provides rationale that older adults with T2D (or at high risk for developing T2D) should simply concentrate on performing RET without having to worry about the exercise intensity.…”
Section: Resistance Exercise Training and Type 2 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide-ranging health benefits of regular RET are well established; however, adherence to RET in older adults remains low, and the most commonly cited barriers to participation of RET are: (1) risk of injury (from lifting heavy relative loads) and (2) required access to a gym facility (Burton et al, 2017). However, utilizing one’s own body weight as resistance, or light-to-moderate relative loads (30–69% of 1RM) is just as effective as lifting heavy relative loads (≥70% of 1RM) for exerting health benefits (Lira et al, 2010; Lustosa et al, 2011; Sheikholeslami Vatani et al, 2011; Cornelissen and Smart, 2013; Strasser et al, 2013; Csapo and Alegre, 2016; Yang et al, 2017; Stamatakis et al, 2018). Cognizant of these findings, RET recommendations have been formulated, which may aid older adults in adhering to and thus reducing chronic disease risk (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resistance Exercise Training Recommendations For Reducing Agmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fasting glucose and HbA1c were most frequently reported; six (of 16) studies demonstrated a significant decrease in postintervention glucose levels, 22,24,25,30,32,36 and HbA1c significantly decreased in 12 studies. 12,20,22,23,28,30,[32][33][34][35]38 No significance in HOMA-IR (five significant of 14 reports) or fasting insulin (three of nine) was observed following high-intensity exercise in the majority of outcomes.…”
Section: Outcomes According To Intensity or Typementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The postintervention results by intensity in the remaining studies were increased or decreased, although nonsignificant. Three studies comparing high and moderate intensities found significant decreases in fasting glucose from high intensity 30,32,36 while three 30,32,38 reported a significant decrease following moderate intensity. For HbA1c, three studies observed a significantly greater decrease following high-intensity exercise versus MIE.…”
Section: Outcomes According To Intensity or Typementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation