F1030, F1031, and F1032 Sugarbeet Germplasms Selected from Crosses between L19 and Three Cultivated/Wild Germplasms

Campbell, L. G.

doi:10.3198/jpr2015.02.0006crg

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…maritima from Greece, PI 546420, and a sugarbeet germplasm line, L53, were characterized by Doney (1995) as unique sources of genetic variability for combining ability and root yield. To ameliorate the relatively low sucrose concentration often associated with populations derived from crosses between sugarbeet and its wild relatives, y318, y322, and y387 were backcrossed to a high-sucrose sugarbeet germplasm line, L19, and after selection released as F1030, F1031, and F1032, respectively (Campbell 2015). Seven additional germplasm lines selected from crosses between wild Beta species and a sugarbeet breeding line from California also will expedite the introduction of genetic diversity into the commercial crop (Campbell, 2009).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sugarbeet Germplasm Lines Selected from Crosses between Wild Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima from France, Belgium, and Denmark and Cultivated Sugar Beet

Campbell¹,

Fugate²

2018

JSBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The genetic basis of sugarbeet is very narrow. Moreover, it is recognized that introgression of genetic diversity into elite populations enhances long-term breeding progress. Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima, a wild relative of sugarbeet, is a source for increasing the genetic diversity within cultivated sugarbeet. Being closely related to sugarbeet, fertility problems among hybrid progeny are rare. B. v. subsp. maritima is distributed over a large geographic area and therefore exposed to a wide range of environmental conditions and disease organisms. This report describes eleven sugarbeet germplasm lines; F1044,

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%