DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-9385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabric hand as perceived by US and Korean males and females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest correlation was found among nonMetS patients. There are many studies documenting the relationship between CRP and BMI [30]. Surprisingly, a correlation between CRP and PASI was not found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The highest correlation was found among nonMetS patients. There are many studies documenting the relationship between CRP and BMI [30]. Surprisingly, a correlation between CRP and PASI was not found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It may also be appropriate to test whether un-trained consumers rate textiles more closely to objective testing results when using prescribed handling and manipulation methods such as those suggested by the AATCC Evaluation Procedure 5 (2006). Kim and Winakor (1996) also suggest that unipolar perceptual scales are more intuitive for participants than bi-polar scales. Although this is not standard descriptive practice in the textile industry, further study with unipolar perceptual scales may clarify the usage of terms such as Warm and Cool.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For the purposes of this study, we draw on those that included visibility of the textiles (Picard et al, 2003;Philippe et al, 2003;Soufflet et al, 2004), un-trained consumers (Winakor et al, 1980;Laughlin, 1991;Kim and Winakor, 1996;Hung and Chuang, 1999;Picard et al, 2003;Nogueira et al, 2009), trained panels and textile experts (Moody et al, 2001;Philippe et al, 2003;Soufflet et al, 2004;Valatkiene and Strazdiene, 2006;Sular and Okur, 2008), types of rating including bi-polar (Winakor et al, 1980;Hung and Chuang, 1999;Philippe et al, 2003;Sular and Okur, 2008;Soufflet et al, 2004) or grouping and difference [e.g., Triadic Comparison or Free Sorting (Laughlin, 1991;Moody et al, 2001;Philippe et al, 2003;Picard et al, 2003;Soufflet et al, 2004)], samples of differing specifications and handling gestures (Winakor et al, 1980;Picard et al, 2003;AATCC Evaluation Procedure 5, 2006;Valatkiene and Strazdiene, 2006;Sular and Okur, 2008).…”
Section: Textile Hand Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 It seems that the uniformity of the group of persons who estimate the hand subjectively is important. Nationality, age (the sense of touch, suffers from deleterious effect of age -the effects of ageing are substantially greater in the Pacinian corpuscles than in other mechanoreceptors), gender, touching time, applied force, the speed of finger movement, 50 menstrual cycle (cutaneous sensitivity to painful stimuli, to changes in skin temperature, and to tactile stimulation have also been found to vary with the menstrual cycle; after the onset of menstruation, thresholds of Pacinian corpuscles increase reaching maximum near the ovulation time) and occupational activity, [51][52][53][54][55] with educational background as a secondary issue along with everyday life, all have an influence on the fingertips' skin surface quality.…”
Section: Hand Of Textiles Versus Subjective Techniques For Its Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%