2017
DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/30/cjcp1703026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabricating Core-Shell WC@C/Pt Structures and its Enhanced Performance for Methanol Electrooxidation

Abstract: The spray-dried spheres within a W/Pt multi-separation can be used to prepare discrete core-shell WC@C/Pt catalysts through a typical carburization production mechanism at 800 • C. In contrast with previous studies of the WC/Pt synthesis, the reaction observed here proceeds through an indirect annealing mechanism at 600 • C wherein species diffuse, thereby resulting in core-shell structure, and Pt nanoparticles were successfully dispersed in size/shape and randomly scattered across the in situ produced C spher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, all the current densities were normalized by the mass of loaded Pt. The forward peak current density of MOR on 10% Pt-WC/C (Figure S4a) was up to 594.3 mA mg –1 , about 2.0, 2.7, and 3.3 times higher than those on JM 20% Pt/C (298.2 mA mg –1 ), 5% Pt-WC/C (221.0 mA mg –1 ), and 15% Pt-WC/C (182.0 mA mg –1 ) catalysts, respectively, which was also more competitive than those of recent state-of-the-art WC-based nanostructures such as Pt/WC/GC catalyst, Pt@WC/OMC, and WC@C/Pt . The apparent activation energies ( E ap ) can be obtained from the slopes of Arrhenius plots (Figure S5) at both applied potentials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, all the current densities were normalized by the mass of loaded Pt. The forward peak current density of MOR on 10% Pt-WC/C (Figure S4a) was up to 594.3 mA mg –1 , about 2.0, 2.7, and 3.3 times higher than those on JM 20% Pt/C (298.2 mA mg –1 ), 5% Pt-WC/C (221.0 mA mg –1 ), and 15% Pt-WC/C (182.0 mA mg –1 ) catalysts, respectively, which was also more competitive than those of recent state-of-the-art WC-based nanostructures such as Pt/WC/GC catalyst, Pt@WC/OMC, and WC@C/Pt . The apparent activation energies ( E ap ) can be obtained from the slopes of Arrhenius plots (Figure S5) at both applied potentials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The forward peak current density of MOR on 10% Pt-WC/C (Figure S4a) was up to 594.3 mA mg −1 , about 2.0, 2.7, and 3.3 times higher than those on JM 20% Pt/C (298.2 mA mg −1 ), 5% Pt-WC/C (221.0 mA mg −1 ), and 15% Pt-WC/C (182.0 mA mg −1 ) catalysts, respectively, which was also more competitive than those of recent state-of-the-art WC-based nanostructures such as Pt/WC/GC catalyst, 10 Pt@WC/ OMC, 11 and WC@C/Pt. 12 The apparent activation energies (E ap ) can be obtained from the slopes of Arrhenius plots (Figure S5) at both applied potentials. The E ap value is found as 28.5 kJ mol −1 at 0.5 V and 34.0 kJ mol −1 at 0.6 V for 10% Pt-WC/C electro-catalysts, which is lower than those of 20% JM Pt/C (65.4 and 48.3 kJ mol −1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%