2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabricating over 7%-efficient Sb2(S,Se)3 thin-film solar cells by vapor transport deposition using Sb2Se3 and Sb2S3 mixed powders as the evaporation source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure a, from AS-1 to AS-7 films, all the XRD spectra exhibited nearly the same diffraction peaks over the entire range, and only the corresponding diffraction angles had a little shift to a larger angle. Because the S atom is larger than the Se atom, the lattice constant of Sb 2 S 3 is also larger than that of Sb 2 Se 3 ; thus, the corresponding diffraction peak position would shift to a higher angle for a similar phase structure, which results in a difference between the standard PDF cards of orthorhombic Sb 2 Se 3 and Sb 2 S 3 . , Besides, all the films showed a preferred orientation of (221), which has been demonstrated to be beneficial for the carrier transport. , The same preferred orientation illustrated that different Se/S ratios of the mixed powder sources would hardly influence the orientation of the deposited films, but influence the phase once the other deposition parameters are the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As shown in Figure a, from AS-1 to AS-7 films, all the XRD spectra exhibited nearly the same diffraction peaks over the entire range, and only the corresponding diffraction angles had a little shift to a larger angle. Because the S atom is larger than the Se atom, the lattice constant of Sb 2 S 3 is also larger than that of Sb 2 Se 3 ; thus, the corresponding diffraction peak position would shift to a higher angle for a similar phase structure, which results in a difference between the standard PDF cards of orthorhombic Sb 2 Se 3 and Sb 2 S 3 . , Besides, all the films showed a preferred orientation of (221), which has been demonstrated to be beneficial for the carrier transport. , The same preferred orientation illustrated that different Se/S ratios of the mixed powder sources would hardly influence the orientation of the deposited films, but influence the phase once the other deposition parameters are the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…photovoltaic application due to their low toxicity, high light absorption coefficient, high earth-abundancy and excellent photoelectric properties. [1][2][3][4][5] Combining the advantages of antimony selenide (Sb 2 Se 3 ) and antimony sulfide (Sb 2 S 3 ) semiconductors, Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 solar cells provide a favorable balance between open-circuit voltage (V OC ) and short-circuit current density (J SC ), while maintaining a high fill factor (FF). The band gap of Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 can be adjusted between 1.1 and 1.7 eV by varying the atomic ratio Se/(Se+S), so as to match the solar spectrum in view of the Shockley-Queisser (S-Q) limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface lattice mismatches of Sb 2 S 3 and Sb 2 Se 3 double layers are less than 5% for most crystal faces, which can reduce the interface recombination. [ 22,23 ] p‐type Sb 2 Se 3 with hole mobility of 42 cm 2 V −1 s −1 has the capacity for efficient charge transport and collection. [ 24 ] Sb 2 Se 3 film can form good ohmic contact with Au because of the closer valence band level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%