2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and characterisation of electrospun Polycaprolactone/Polysuccinimide composite meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to having the highest vapor pressure examining the viscosity and conductivity study results DMF based solutions had the lowest viscosity and highest conductivity (Table 5) indicating that these parameters are needed to produced quality PSI fibers. While DMSO and DMAc did not produce fibers of equal quality to DMF, these solvents could be potentially beneficial in formulation of binary solutions for electrospinning or blend electrospinning of two polymers 36 . This is further suggested by the chemical analysis, as prominent peaks found in the solvents cannot be found in the corresponding meshes therefore we can conclude that the solvents have indeed evaporated during the electrospinning process and can be utilized without any potential side effects caused by the solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition to having the highest vapor pressure examining the viscosity and conductivity study results DMF based solutions had the lowest viscosity and highest conductivity (Table 5) indicating that these parameters are needed to produced quality PSI fibers. While DMSO and DMAc did not produce fibers of equal quality to DMF, these solvents could be potentially beneficial in formulation of binary solutions for electrospinning or blend electrospinning of two polymers 36 . This is further suggested by the chemical analysis, as prominent peaks found in the solvents cannot be found in the corresponding meshes therefore we can conclude that the solvents have indeed evaporated during the electrospinning process and can be utilized without any potential side effects caused by the solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To avoid this methodology problem in our study, the specific load capacity (Equation (1)) was determined instead of the ultimate strain and the initial modulus (Equation (2)) (see Figures S5–S7, Supporting Information) instead of Young's modulus. [ 32 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific load capacity was calculated as the ratio of the highest load value from the elongation curves (maximal load) and the area density of the samples (Equation (1)). The area density of the samples was calculated [ 32 ] according to Equation (2): Specificloadcapacity[]Nnormalm2normalgbadbreak=Maximalload[]NAreadensity[]normalgm2$$\begin{equation}{\rm{Specific\;load\;capacity}}\left[ {\frac{{{\rm{N}}{{\rm{m}}^2}}}{{\rm{g}}}} \right] = \frac{{{\rm{Maximal\;load\;}}\left[ {\rm{N}} \right]}}{{{\rm{Area\;density\;}}\left[ {\frac{{\rm{g}}}{{{{\rm{m}}^2}}}} \right]}}\end{equation}$$ Areadensity[]normalgm2badbreak=Massofthesample[]gSurfaceofthesample[]normalm2$$\begin{equation}{\rm{Area\;density}}\left[ {\frac{{\rm{g}}}{{{{\rm{m}}^2}}}} \right] = \frac{{{\rm{Mass\;of\;the\;sample\;}}\left[ {\rm{g}} \right]}}{{{\rm{Surface\;of\;the\;sample\;}}\left[ {{{\rm{m}}^2}} \right]}}\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 41 ] Besides, the signal at 1541 cm −1 arises from amide II and the band at 1221 cm −1 corresponds to amide III (both ν(C‐N) and δ(N‐H) in urethane groups). [ 42 ] Finally, peaks at 1157 and 1040 cm −1 can be attributed to ν(C‐O‐C) of PCL ester bond (soft segment, SS) [ 43 ] and ν(C–O–C) urethane stretching vibration (hard segment, HS), [ 44 ] respectively. Signals ascribed to GC particles were not detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%