2002
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2002.800266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and characterization of continuous wave direct UV (λ=244 nm) written channel waveguides in chalcogenide (Ga:La:S) glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insertion losses were determined by measuring the output power of the waveguide coupled to a standard telecom fiber and comparing this value with the output power of the fiber itself at 1440 nm, in order to avoid Er 3+ ion absorption at 1550 nm. Coupling losses were then estimated by calculating the spatial overlap integrals of the guided mode of the fiber and that of the waveguide, according to [32]. In this way, by subtracting the coupling losses from the total insertion loss, and once Fresnel losses are computed, an upper limit of the propagation loss is obtained, as no extrinsic losses are taken into account such as longitudinal, transversal, or angular displacements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insertion losses were determined by measuring the output power of the waveguide coupled to a standard telecom fiber and comparing this value with the output power of the fiber itself at 1440 nm, in order to avoid Er 3+ ion absorption at 1550 nm. Coupling losses were then estimated by calculating the spatial overlap integrals of the guided mode of the fiber and that of the waveguide, according to [32]. In this way, by subtracting the coupling losses from the total insertion loss, and once Fresnel losses are computed, an upper limit of the propagation loss is obtained, as no extrinsic losses are taken into account such as longitudinal, transversal, or angular displacements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some corrections had to be made to both powers ( and ). The estimation of the propagation losses has to consider though some corrections to the values of and like the transmission losses of the microscope objectives, the Fresnel losses at the waveguide interfaces, the losses associated to the mismatch between the laser field distribution at the focal plane of the lens and the mode of the waveguide (calculated through the corresponding overlapping integral [23]). Since we have not corrected the losses associated to the effect of the different numerical apertures of the waveguide and the input microscope objective and the losses associated to the absorption of the beam by the small amount of Yb present in the waveguide, the estimated value of the propagation loss have to be considered as an exaggerated upper bound.…”
Section: B Near-field Pattern and Propagation Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalcogenide fibers guiding at 10 µm have been studied for astronomical applications [15], while a recent experiment at the Keck telescopes [16] showed the possibility to use fluoride fibers to extend the interferometer capability up to 2.2 µm. On the other hand, direct UV writing has been demonstrated both in chalcogenide [17] and fluoride glasses [18]. Therefore, it is possible, in principle, to reproduce our UV-written IO beam combiner in a new material with wider wavelengthoperation range.…”
Section: Interferometric Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%