2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and investigation of a biocompatible microfilament with high mechanical performance based on regenerated bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose

Abstract: A high-strength regenerated bacterial cellulose (RBC)/bacterial cellulose (BC) microfilament of potential use as a biomaterial was successfully prepared via a wet spinning process. The BC not only consists of a 3-D network composed of nanofibers with a diameter of several hundred nanometers but also has a secondary structure consisting of highly oriented nanofibrils with a diameter ranging from a few nanometers to tens of nanometers which explains the reason for the high mechanical strength of BC. Furthermore,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scaffolds biocompatibility depends on the cell behavior after direct contact, and especially to the adhesion ability on their surface. Our in vitro results showed the ability of BC to promote cell adhesion to the PHB scaffolds, and to promote cell growth and proliferation, while regenerated bacterial cellulose/microfilaments of bacterial cellulose provided good cytocompatibility on a cell viability assay [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The scaffolds biocompatibility depends on the cell behavior after direct contact, and especially to the adhesion ability on their surface. Our in vitro results showed the ability of BC to promote cell adhesion to the PHB scaffolds, and to promote cell growth and proliferation, while regenerated bacterial cellulose/microfilaments of bacterial cellulose provided good cytocompatibility on a cell viability assay [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…27,28 These regenerated cellulose II crystals and the amorphous cellulose macromolecular chains as continuous phases wrapped the undissolved cellulose I nanofiber to form a "self-fiber-reinforced structure", which contributes to rigidity of the spinning macrofiber. 10 When the dissolution time reaches 20 h, the overlapping peaks are assigned to cellulose II at approximately 20.4 and 21.9°. It implies that the nanofibers are almost completely dissolved to form an aggregation structure dominated by cellulose II crystals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 As shown in Figures 2e,f and S3b, the surface and cross-sectional SEM images of the fiber confirm the above result. 34,35 Although there are relatively obvious grooves on the surface of the dry-wet spinning fibers (Figure 2f), which may be caused by the loss of exchange moisture during the drying process, 4,10,36 the denser structure of the macrofibers would be beneficial to the improvement of the mechanical properties. Table S1 lists the tensile mechanical properties of BC macrofibers for different BC concentrations (2, 4, 6 wt %) and different dissolution times (8, 10, 12, 14, 16 h) of BC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations