2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling for bone tissue engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common polymers that are printed via FFF are acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], and poly(lactic acid) (PLA) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. However, other polymers such as poly(ether imide) (PEI) [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], polycarbonate (PC) [ 27 , 28 , 29 ], polystyrene (PS) [ 30 , 31 ], polyamide (PA) [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], polypropylene (PP) [ 35 , 36 , 37 ],poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], polyethylene (PE) [ 42 , 43 ], polycaprolactone (PCL) [ 44 , 45 ], polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) [ 46 ], and polymer blends [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ] have been also studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common polymers that are printed via FFF are acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], and poly(lactic acid) (PLA) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. However, other polymers such as poly(ether imide) (PEI) [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], polycarbonate (PC) [ 27 , 28 , 29 ], polystyrene (PS) [ 30 , 31 ], polyamide (PA) [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], polypropylene (PP) [ 35 , 36 , 37 ],poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], polyethylene (PE) [ 42 , 43 ], polycaprolactone (PCL) [ 44 , 45 ], polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) [ 46 ], and polymer blends [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ] have been also studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encouraged the use of 3D printing (also known as rapid prototyping and solid freeform fabrication) technologies to allow the digital CAD design and digital manufacturing of tissue engineering scaffolds [1]. Figure 1 shows the schematic of CAD-designed scaffolds with interconnected macropores and examples of scaffolds fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and stereolithography (SLA) [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. In these scaffolds, the line width W and line spacing S (Figure 1(a)) can be easily tuned, thereby achieving controllable pore geometry, size, and interconnectivity.…”
Section: Origin Principle and Processes Of Low-temperature Depositimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1: Examples of interconnected porous tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing technologies. (a) 0°-90°crossing, (b) 0°-60°-120°crossing, (c, d) PCL scaffolds (0°-90°crossing) by fused deposition modelling (FDM), (e, f) PCL scaffolds (0°-60°-120°crossing) by FDM [20], (g, h) poly(D,L)-lactide (PDLLA) scaffolds by stereolithography [32], (i-k) poly(vinyl alcohol)/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffold (PVA/β-TCP) by FDM [21], and (l) porous 45S5 bioglass scaffold by SLA [33]. Reproduced with permission.…”
Section: Origin Principle and Processes Of Low-temperature Depositimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocates of this method have risen in recent years because of some reasons like the ability of fabricating complicated pore architecture with different shapes and designs, and providing good capability to have control over porosity, pore size, and stiffness. 8,9 Fused deposition modelling (FDM), 10 selective laser sintering (SLS), 11 and stereolithography (SLA) 12 are some important subcategories of AM technique that fabricate scaffolds directly from a computer-aided design (CAD) file. In spite of their advantages, AM methods have some limitations in many aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fused deposition modelling (FDM), 10 selective laser sintering (SLS), 11 and stereolithography (SLA) 12 are some important subcategories of AM technique that fabricate scaffolds directly from a computer-aided design (CAD) file. In spite of their advantages, AM methods have some limitations in many aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%