2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-013-1566-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and properties of sulfur (S)-doped ZnO nanorods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations have been previously reported concerning the reduction of dislocation due to sulfur doping. 53,54…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar observations have been previously reported concerning the reduction of dislocation due to sulfur doping. 53,54…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affinity of carbon or silica for ibuprofen was low. It can be compared from the electronegativities of C (2.5), Si (1.8), and Zn (1.6) [9] compared to O (3.5) in the O-H group, which has different electronegativities, respectively are 1.0, 1.7 and 1.9. With a high difference in electronegativity from Gunningite when interacting with Ibuprofen, it gives the advantage of attracting many ibuprofen molecules during the adsorption process.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper doping in wide bandgap semiconductors like ZnO can improve the electrical conductivity from semiconducting to semimetal by maintaining its transparency. , The presence of half ionic and half covalent bond in Zn–O is beneficial in terms of ease of doping compared to other covalent bond wide bandgap semiconductors . Although the doping of 1D ZnO by various dopants like Al, Ga, Sn, Sb, In, etc., is well-known, anion doping of ZnO from chalcogen elements like sulfur (S) in ZnO is relatively rare. Owing to the atomic size difference between S (atom radii = 1.09 Å) and oxygen (atom radii = 0.65 Å), and the difference in their electronegativities (2.58 and 3.54 eV, respectively for S and O, on a Pauling scale), S-doping in ZnO should ideally enhance the electrical properties of the doped material . However, the difference between S stabilization and ZnO growth temperatures offer stiff challenge in S-doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%