2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication, characterization, and mechanical properties of 93W–4.9Ni–2.1Fe/95W–2.8Ni–1.2Fe–1Al2O3 heavy alloy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, manifest four local failure modes, namely: W-W interparticle fracture (WW), W cleavage (WC), W-NiWFe interfacial debonding (WD), and NiWFe ductile phase rupture (DR). These local failure modes have been widely reported in previous studies of WHA[24,29,30,[33][34][35][37][38][39][40]. The WW interface is the weakest and, as expected, this fracture mode increases with increasing W[24,29,34,35,[37][38][39][40].…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3, manifest four local failure modes, namely: W-W interparticle fracture (WW), W cleavage (WC), W-NiWFe interfacial debonding (WD), and NiWFe ductile phase rupture (DR). These local failure modes have been widely reported in previous studies of WHA[24,29,30,[33][34][35][37][38][39][40]. The WW interface is the weakest and, as expected, this fracture mode increases with increasing W[24,29,34,35,[37][38][39][40].…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…This damage is responsible for the lower RT ductility in the higher W WHAs. Most previous studies reported that more frequent WC microcracks increase tensile ductility [30,34]. However, WC decreases ductility at high W due to the linking of particle-sized microcracks to form a larger, unstably growing crack.…”
Section: Tensile Test Damage Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations