Fabrication laboratories

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the current state of fabrication laboratories (Fab Lab), an international network of digital laboratories, which provides new technological tools for digital manufacturing that can be used from individual users, to small businesses and schools. The aim is to understand similarities and differences of skills, technologies used and customers served among the main European laboratories (Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain) and the American ones. Design/methodology/approach Data from European and American Fab Labs were collected using a questionnaire survey performed on a total sample of n=493 Fab Labs. The administration of the survey took place through e-mail; 73 Fab Labs participated to the survey, reaching a total response rate of 14.81 percent. Findings The results show that Italian laboratories are characterized by ample space available, but limited capacity for investment in machinery and technology. European Fab Labs are similar to the Italian Fab Labs, while the American ones are more heterogeneous in size. However, a fact that emerges clearly from the results is how American Fab Labs are more important realities than European ones in terms of turnover and investments. They are more similar to businesses with an independent financial support. Originality/value The novelty of the study resides in the issue considered and the experimental techniques used. Some qualitative case studies have been developed in the field, but no previous quantitative analyses have been developed on a large sample of Fab Labs, developing comparisons between European and American realities of these digital laboratories.

Maker Networks Fighting Covid-19: Design Guidelines for Redistributed Manufacturing (RDM) Models

“…A Maker Network may bring many benefits either to urban areas (Wolf-Powers et al, 2017) or rural ones (Smith, 2017) and may generate impacts on how actors interact (Browder, Aldrich, & Bradley, 2019;; the technology usage (Waller & Fawcett, 2014;Wolf-Powers et al, 2017); the product/service characteristics (Browder et al, 2019;Hamalainen, Mohajeri, & Nyberg, 2018); and the development of business models (Doussard et al, 2017;Santos, Murmura, & Bravi, 2018;Smith, 2017). This paper defines a Maker Network as a group of people and organizations related to the Maker Movement working as a team to produce some good or deliver some service.…”

Systematic Literature Review: Integration of Additive Manufacturing and Industry 4.0

“…In recent years, Industry 4.0 has seen significant advances in production processes, data management, cybersecurity, and competitiveness based on customization and client relationship (see Figure 2) [37,[41][42][43]. Industry 4.0, well known as the fourth industrial revolution, was born in Germany as Industrie 4.0 in 2011 as a proposal to develop the German economy [44,45].…”

A Rapid Improvement Process through “Quick-Win” Lean Tools: A Case Study

“…Integrated with the internal communication project, the intention is for the entire company to be provided with daily data for decision making. This communication is performed transversally and vertically, based on the LL project, in which communication constitutes one of the pillars for the development of employees [19][20][21] at a time when customers are increasingly more demanding [22][23][24].…”