2013
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201301658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of 3D Microstructures from Interactions of Immiscible Liquids with a Structured Surface

Abstract: A new lithography technique is presented that exploits the interactions of immiscible liquids with a structured surface. This highly parallel, “low‐tech” method requires no dedicated equipment and easily produces curved and/or multi‐level structures out of a variety of photoactive and non‐photoactive materials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in agreement with our prediction, CR = r/R = cosθ (see Figure 2b, see the Supporting Information for details). Based on our observations (see Figure 2c–f), the array of μ‐SCs fabricated with the s‐PUA‐based mold had the highest meniscus curvature because of greater molecular interactions than other molds 27. By controlling the meniscus of a viscous precursor, we obtained adhesive patches with uniform, fiber arrays of different 3D microtips, tailored by capillarity as shown in Figure 2c–f; and Figure S4, Supporting Information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This result is in agreement with our prediction, CR = r/R = cosθ (see Figure 2b, see the Supporting Information for details). Based on our observations (see Figure 2c–f), the array of μ‐SCs fabricated with the s‐PUA‐based mold had the highest meniscus curvature because of greater molecular interactions than other molds 27. By controlling the meniscus of a viscous precursor, we obtained adhesive patches with uniform, fiber arrays of different 3D microtips, tailored by capillarity as shown in Figure 2c–f; and Figure S4, Supporting Information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[95] In a related technique, the geometry of 3D molds, which can be fabricated following traditional lithographic techniques, are augmented using the wetting properties of liquids (Figure 3B). [96] These properties are readily tuned by modifying the surface chemistry of the molds so that dispensed droplets either wet the walls of the mold or bead up as desired ( Figure 3B). Again, these droplets are immiscible in the prepolymer of the target PM, which is generated by first augmenting the geometry of the original template with the droplets and casting the prepolymer against it, resulting in complicated structures with concave and convex curvatures, as well as interpenetrating holes and arrayed posts ( Figure 3B).…”
Section: Liquid-based Mastersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35][36] The patterns processed by photolithography provide confine geometry as well as lateral features for cellular adhesion. Due to the multiple features of the patterns this reduces the detrimental effects of cell arrays when cultured for longer time, in contrast to those of other patterning techniques.…”
Section: Photolithographymentioning
confidence: 99%