Fabrication of cast post and core by a modified indirect procedure and postcementation using a novel technique

Shaikh, Adiba; Mandke, Lalitagauri; Padhye, Leena

doi:10.4103/ijohr.ijohr_43_17

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This flexibility not only ensured better fit but also enhanced the overall success of the restoration. 2 Nevertheless, the pursuit of a harmonious balance between aesthetic appeal and optimal occlusion in restorations remains a challenge that demands considerable clinical judgment. This challenge is particularly pronounced when dealing with premolars, where the presence of divergent canals adds an extra layer of complexity to the restoration process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Custom made cast post and core on a mandibular premolar using direct approach

Sikri,

Sikri

2023

APRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Custom-made cast post and core plays a crucial role in the restoration of extensively decayed teeth, offering a level of flexibility that addresses the specific needs of each case. The core serves as an anchor within the root canal, providing stability and support for the subsequent prosthetic restoration. The process of creating a design for a cast post and core involves strategic decision-making. This can be achieved through two primary methods: direct formation within the patient's mouth or indirect fabrication on a model. Each approach presents its own set of advantages and considerations. In the direct method, where the design is crafted within the patient's mouth, a unique challenge arises due to the inherent variations in root alignment. The creation of custom-made cast post and core is a multifaceted process that requires careful consideration of factors such as root alignment and anatomical intricacies. The utilization of inventive approaches, like the direct method presented here, showcases the ongoing advancements in restorative dentistry, ultimately leading to successful outcomes in challenging cases. In the present case report, a custom-made cast post and core was fabricated using a direct method.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Custom made cast post and core on a mandibular premolar using direct approach

Sikri,

Sikri

2023

APRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The reinforcement could be a paper clip, orthodontic wire, plastic posts, toothpicks, etc. It is more time-consuming because it involves lab work ( Shaikh et al, 2017 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study

Soliman

Alshamrani

Yahya

et al. 2021

Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The gold standard for restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) with successful clinical longevity requires having minimal invasive preparations and maximal tissue conservation. Many dentists still consider hybrid post/core/crown to be the first choice for restoring ETT. Endocrown is a viable alternative treatment modality to hybrid post/core/crown. This study aims to assess the proper judgment of dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on the use of monolithic endocrown versus hybrid post/core/crown for restoring ETT. The IRB of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU) Institutional Review Board reviewed this study. The questionnaire was validated and electronically distributed. The participants were pre-informed that their responses are completely anonymous and used for professional purposes only. The questionnaire surveyed dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, about their preference for different ETT restorative modalities at various clinical scenarios. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and t -test. All P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 275 responses were collected; 61.45% were females and 38.55% males. 56% of them were general practitioners, while 16% were consultants. Prefabricated post/core was the most preferred technique among the participants (18.55%), followed by endocrown (12.36%), and lastly, cast post/core (8.73%). The amount of remaining tooth structure was the most influential in the treatment selection (30.18%), followed by the presence or absence of 1–2 mm ferrule (17.82%). Interocclusal space (12.36%) was the least influential factor. Endocrown recorded 63.27% as the most preferred line of treatment in case of insufficient inter-occlusal space. 40.36% preferred endocrown for patients with occlusal risk factors. The amount of the remaining tooth structure and the tooth position significantly affect the treatment options of the participants. Endocrown was the most preferred treatment modality for restoring ETT for patients with occlusal consideration.

show abstract

“…7 The diffi culty with the conventional indirect method is that there is chance of stripping away of the selected reinforcement material (metallic wire, plastic post, or toothpicks) during removal of impression or after pouring of the cast. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Placing of the reinforcement material into the canal is an additional time-consuming procedure and seating the reinforcement material onto the orifi ces of the root canals may be diffi cult or impractical in cases with diffi cult clinical access or in cases where multiple teeth are involved 13 which may lead to inaccurate impressions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%