“…For instance, the S‐MoO 3− x electrode yields a remarkable areal capacitance of 506 mF cm −2 (220 F g −1 ) at 10 mV s −1 , which is about 2.6 times that of MoO 3 electrodes (192 mF cm −2 ; 76 F g −1 ). Moreover, the areal capacitance of the S‐MoO 3− x electrode is also substantially higher than the values of previously reported MoO 3 ‐based electrodes, such as MoO 3 @carbon nanotube (CNT) (252.7 mF cm −2 , 190 F g −1 , 10 mV s −1 ), Ag quantum dots/MoO 3 (44.25 mF cm −2 , ≈11 mV s −1 ), MoO 3 /graphene oxide(GO)/CNTs/Graphene(G) sheet (115 mF cm −2 , 20 mV s −1 ), MoO 3 /TiO 2 /Ti 3 C 2 T x (162 F g −1 , 2 mV s −1 ) . Particularly, the areal capacitance of MoO 3 electrodes significantly decreased to a value of 9.5 mF cm −2 as the scan rate increased to 400 mV s −1 , while that of the S‐MoO 3− x electrode retains 195 mF cm −2 , outperforming reported values of MoO 3 ‐based electrodes at high rate, such as MoO 3 @CNT (105 mF cm −2 , 79 F g −1 , 200 mV s −1 ), MoO 3 /GO/MWCNTs/G sheet (56 mF cm −2 , 80 mV s −1 ), MoO 3 /TiO 2 /Ti 3 C 2 T x (75 F g −1 , 100 mV s −1 ) .…”