Fabrication of Implant-Assisted Restorations Utilizing Functional Impression Techniques: Case Reports

Uludağ, Bülent; Celik, Gozde; Şahin, Volkan; Ozturk, Ozge

doi:10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[297:foiruf]2.0.co;2

Cited by 6 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So that there is no need to sinus augmentation or nerve-repositioning-surgery, 10) Converting a Kennedy Class Ι or II RPD to a toothimplant-supported RPD which may be considered as a Kennedy Class III, 11) Psychological benefit of preserving patient's natural teeth with less than optimal prognosis, at least for an interim period, 12) A "staged" approach in implant insertion may be performed according to patient's budget, 3,14,18,20,[26][27][28][29][30] 13) Oral hygiene may be provided more easily than fixed prostheses and nocturnal bruxism can be reduced or eliminated due to its removal during night, 12,31 14) In the case of greater crown-height-space (CHS) resulting from excessive RRR, macrotrauma or ablative surgery, IRRPD seems to be a better biomechanical option. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospective clinical study of prosthetic treatment outcome of implant-retained- removable-partial-denture during 5 year-follow-ups

Bahrami¹,

Alsharbaty²

2017

AMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospective clinical study of prosthetic treatment outcome of implant-retained- removable-partial-denture during 5 year-follow-ups

Bahrami¹,

Alsharbaty²

2017

AMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This time interval was set to ensure complete adaptation of the patients to the overdenture according to evidence based knowledge. After the six months, the second IRMO was fabricated using FIT 30 . The preliminary impression of the jaws was made again with an irreversible hydrocolloid (CA37).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2,26 Finally, the third type of impression technique is a functional impression technique (FIT) for IROs. [27][28][29][30] One type impression material, especially polyether or vinyl polysiloxane impression materials, is used to transfer the implant positions from the oral cavity to the master cast for single stage impression techniques. 31 However, an IRO has different characteristics from the complete denture due to combination of the tissue support and the implant retention.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…22,32 On the contrary, FITs have been reported to record the alveolar mucosa in a functional state and the implant components correctly. [27][28][29][30][31] Although several techniques and case reports have been reported for making impression of IROs, any clinical studies which are evaluating effect of the implant impression techniques on satisfaction of the patient are lacking. Because, the impression is one of the important stages to fabricate accurate IROs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because, the impression is one of the important stages to fabricate accurate IROs. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the clinical results of the single stage closed tray impression technique (CTIT) 25 and a FIT 30 for IRMOs. The hypothesis is to define which overdenture impression technique is better for satisfaction of the patient.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of Effect of Impression Techniques to Satisfaction of Edentulous Patients Treated With Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Pilot Study

TOKAR¹,

Polat²,

ULUDAĞ³

2016

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The implant-retained mandibular overdentures are standard care of the edentulous patients. Function, phonetics and satisfaction of the patient are decisive to acquire prospering treatment results. Passive fit between the implants and the denture framework is important for restoration of the implants. Accurate impression is primary factor to obtain fitted denture. Several impression techniques (single stage, double, and functional impression techniques) described making impression of the implant-retained overdentures. The aim of this study was to evaluate influence of two different implant-retained overdenture impression techniques to quality of life of the patients. Materials and Method: Six women edentulous patients participated in this study. 2 implant-retained overdentures were fabricated using two different impression techniques per patient. The first overdentures were produced using the single stage close tray impression technique. After 6 months, the functional impression technique was used to fabricate the second overdentures. 13 questions were asked to the patients about both of their dentures in the first follow up visits those two days after the delivery of their overdentures. The Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis was performed on the acquired data. Results: The patients satisfied with the performance of both of the overdentures. Half of the participants complained soreness of the gums under the overdenture that was fabricated using the close tray impression technique. Other questionnaire items were shown no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The single stage close tray, and the functional impression techniques are used confidently to fabricate the implant-retained mandibular overdentures. The functional impression technique decreased chair time of the post-insertion maintenance.

show abstract

Stress Analysis of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Denture with Anterior Fixed Prostheses and Conventional Implant-Supported Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible

Özel

Ozyilmaz

İnan

2021

Journal of Advanced Oral Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To compare new design implant-supported removable partial dentures retained with anterior fixed prosthesis with a conventional locater and bar attached implant overdenture prostheses retained by two or four implants via photoelastic stress analysis. Materials and Methods: Seven edentulous mandibuler acryclic models prepared and divided into two main groups; two to four implant models, subgroup separation as stated; for two implant models overdenture with locator attachment, crown design retained removable prosthesis with clasp retention, bridge design retained removable prosthesis with clasp retention, bridge design retained removable prosthesis with precision attachment retention; and for four implant models prosthesis with bar attachment overdenture, fixed bridge design retained removable prosthesis with clasp retention, fixed retained removable prosthesis with precision attachment retention. A 300 N load was applied to the first premolars. Photoelastic stress analysis method that is a specific method concerning stress visualization, and does not require statistical analysis, was used. The stress distributions were seen in optically using a poloriscope. Results: In the models with two implant-retained removable partial dentures, the stress distribution was found to be lower than that with the four implant-retained removable partial dentures. Nonsplinted implants caused high stress around the distal implant on the loading side. Conclusion: The stress loads were transmitted to other implants by splinting. Implant-supported removable partial dentures with an anterior fixed prosthetic design show lower stress distributions compared with bar retained prosthesis. These dentures appear to be advantageous in terms of stress transmission.

show abstract

Fabrication of Implant-Assisted Restorations Utilizing Functional Impression Techniques: Case Reports

Abstract: This article describes the fabrication of implant-supported overdentures and removable partial dentures attached to anterior fixed partial dentures utilizing impression techniques to transfer the position of implants and record soft tissue areas in a functional state.

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Prospective clinical study of prosthetic treatment outcome of implant-retained- removable-partial-denture during 5 year-follow-ups

Prospective clinical study of prosthetic treatment outcome of implant-retained- removable-partial-denture during 5 year-follow-ups

Evaluation of Effect of Impression Techniques to Satisfaction of Edentulous Patients Treated With Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Pilot Study

Stress Analysis of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Denture with Anterior Fixed Prostheses and Conventional Implant-Supported Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About