2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.102390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of micro-/submicro-/nanostructured surfaces on Ti–Zr alloy by varying H2SO4/H2O2 treatment conditions and investigations of fundamental properties of a typical surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…%Zr and Ti with H 2 SO 4 /H 2 O 2 to achieve micro/submicron/nano-structured surfaces and found that the MC3T3-E1 cell attachment level after 6 h and 24 h on Ti-30at. %Zr was superior to that of Ti [40] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…%Zr and Ti with H 2 SO 4 /H 2 O 2 to achieve micro/submicron/nano-structured surfaces and found that the MC3T3-E1 cell attachment level after 6 h and 24 h on Ti-30at. %Zr was superior to that of Ti [40] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…15 Zhao et al proposed that the water contact angle of the H 2 SO 4 /H 2 O 2treated Ti-45Zr group was significantly lower than that of the Ti group, which was attributed to the formation of the Ti-45Zr surface oxide films with TiO 2 and ZrO 2 as the main components, accompanied by the presence of a large number of hydroxyl groups. 65 In this study, according to the XPS analysis, an increase in the proportion of oxides such as TiO 2 , Nb 2 O 5 , ZrO 2 , and SnO 2 on the surface of the Ti2448 alloy under the OS microenvironment may improve the surface energy of the material and induce the formation of a more hydrophilic surface. 14,54,66 Hotchkiss et al 16 proposed that rougher and more hydrophilic surfaces are conducive to inducing macrophages to polarize toward the M2 phenotype, leading to an increased release of anti-inflammatory factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, the role of surface roughness remains difficult to understand owing to varying surface topographies and/or chemical compositions across different studies. For instance, one report has suggested that nano-scale surface roughness on Ti surfaces does not influence cell attachment [22,38], whereas, other researchers have reported that micro-, and nano-hybrid roughness improve the cellular function [19,25,27]. The differences in cell adhesion behaviour between titanium and CCM suggest reduced osseointegration capacity of CCM than titanium implants.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis With Titanium and Implications For Ccm ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a crucial property that determines the bonding between the implant and surrounding bone tissue to prevent peri-implantitis caused by bacterial infection or inflammation [16][17][18]. Surface roughness has been extensively studied for titanium implants, and various methods have been employed to optimise surface properties, resulting in improved implant performance [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, similar investigations on the optimisation of surface roughness of CCM implants have been relatively limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%